SELECTION OF SOLID PROPELLANT AND GR AIN GEOMETRY FOR THE DESIGN OF AN OPERATIONAL TACTICAL ROCKET MOTOR

1Bondarenko, MO, 1Vorobei, MM, HABRINETS, VO
1Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro, Ukraine
Space Sci. & Technol. 2026, 32 ;(3):24-32
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2026.03.024
Мова публікації: English
Анотація: 
Th e subject of this paper is to substantiate the selection of the solid rocket propellant type and grain geometry for the sustainer motor
of an operational-tactical missile. Th e paper presents a classifi cation of solid propellants (single-base propellants, homogeneous,
heterogeneous, and modifi ed double-base propellants) and their physicochemical and ballistic characteristics. A comparative
analysis of typical formulations is performed with respect to specifi c impulse, density, smoke signature, crack resistance, and
manufacturability. Based on the requirements imposed on operational-tactical missile systems (operating temperature range,
storage life, launch signature constraints, and production capabilities), the advantages of heterogeneous composite propellants based
on HTPB/AP are justifi ed as a balanced solution providing high energetic performance, mechanical reliability, and manufacturing
feasibility. We also consider alternative propellant options (XZDB, CMDB, ADN-based formulations) for applications requiring
higher low-smoke constraints or specialized thrust profi les. Based on the above, proposed recommendations for selecting the grain
geometry (cast-bonded grains, end-burning, tubular, and slot-channel confi gurations) depend on the required thrust-time profi le
and structural constraints.
Ключові слова: Grain geometry, HTPB, Low-smoke propellant, Slot-channel grain, Solid rocket propellant, Specifi c impulse, Tactical missile
References: 
1. Aoki I., Kubota N. (1994, August). History of solid propellant development in Japan. 30th Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit,
3059. 
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1994-3059
 
2. Bansal L., Jindal P., Rathi V. K. (2025). A Critical Review of Limitations and Challenges in Advancement of HNF as a GreenOxidizer for Composite Solid Propellant Formulations. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.12072
 
3. Bondarenko M., Habrinets V., Vorobei M. (2024). Evolution of Multiple Launch Rocket Systems from Early Rockets to 
HIMARS and Beyond. Challenges and Issues of Modern Science, 3, 23-34. 
https://cims.fti.dp.ua/j/article/view/241
 
4. Bondarenko M., Habrinets V., Vorobei M. (2025). Open-source analysis of the potential confi guration and kinetic performance of the Oreshnik ballistic missile. Challenges and Issues of Modern Science, 4(1), 36-42.
 
5. Bondarenko M., Habrinets V. (2023). Th rust Vector Control of Solid Propellant Operative-Tactical Rockets. Challenges and Issues of Modern Science, 1, 68-73.
https://cims.fti.dp.ua/j/article/view/14
 
6. Bondarenko M. (2025). Design of a Th rust Cut-off System for Launch Vehicles with Solid Rocket Motors. Mechanics and Advanced Technologies, 9(3(106)), 386-394.
https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2025.9.3(106).337052
 
7. Davenas A. (2003). Development of modern soli d propellants. J. propulsion and power, 19(6), 1108-1128.
https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6947
 
8. Hodge K., Crofoot T., Nelson S. (1999, June). Gelled propellants for tactical missile applications. 35th Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit, 2976.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1999-2976
 
9. Liu T., Nie C., Mao Y. F., Zhang Y., Li G., Nie F. D., ..., Chen J. (2025). Design of LitchiLike Al/PTFE with Superior Reactivity and Application in Solid Propellants. Small, 2410377.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202410377
 
10. Mason B. P., Roland C. M. (2019). Solid propellants. Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 92(1), 1-24.
https://doi.org/10.5254/rct.19.80456
 
11. Rarata G., Surmacz P. (2009). Modern solid rocket propellants. Pr. Inst. Lotnictwa, 7(202), 112-124.
 
12. Shahid M., Bilal Khan Niazi M., Jahan Z. (2025). Eff ect of BoronAluminium Particles on Rheological Properties of AP/HTPB Based BiCurative Composite Solid Propellants. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 50(2), e202400223.
https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.202400223
 
13. Thepenier J., Fonblanc G. (2001). Advanced technologies available for future solid propellant grains. Acta Astronautica, 48(5-12), 245-255.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00048-0
 
14. Vorobei M., Bondarenko M. (2024). Using Hydrogen Peroxide for Rocket Fuel Tank Pressurization: Innovations, Advantages, and Challenges. Challenges and Issues of Modern Science, 2, 53-58.
https://cims.fti.dp.ua/j/article/view/192
 
15. Wu C., Liu R., Xu S., Zhang X., Liu X., He Q., ..., Cao W. (2025). Th ermal stability of RDX/HMX-CMDB propellants: combining experiments and ReaxFF MD simulation. J. Th ermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-025-14721-8
 
16. Zhang Y., Liu R., Cao W., Pei Q., Zhao F., Zhang X., ..., Xu S. (2025). Eff ects of RDX and HMX on the thermal stability properties of modifi ed double-base propellants. FirePhysChem. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpc.2025.01.006
 
17. Zhang W., Liu J., Xue X., Xu T., Chen X. (2026). Performance of solid propulsion fuels under simulated deep space exploration 
conditions. Fuel, 404, 136278. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136278