Classification, main types of structures and purpose of capilary means to ensure fuel perfection
Heading:
| 1Minai, OM 1Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine |
| Space Sci. & Technol. 2024, 30 ;(1):14-30 |
| https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2024.01.014 |
| Publication Language: Ukrainian |
Abstract: The flight of a spacecraft is characterized by the alternation of active sections of the trajectory, when the propulsion system is operating, and passive sections, in which the liquid components of the fuel in the tanks are under the influence of microgravity and, as a result, various disturbing factors (actions: aerodynamic forces, solar wind, internal gravitational forces, disturbances from the engines of the orientation and stabilization system, etc. ) can occupy any position in them. At the same time, the situation is not ruled out when the gas phase can get into the flow line, which in the future can lead to a failure to restart the propulsion system and an emergency end of the mission. Therefore, an almost obligatory element of the systems for storing and supplying liquid rocket fuel components of the propulsion system of a spacecraft is the means of ensuring fuel continuity, the main criterion for the perfection of which is the amount of residual fuel components that cannot be produced due to a violation of the fluid continuity at the inlet to the propulsion system. The design of the fuel continuity means is directly determined by the internal geometry of the tank and the characteristics of the pneumohydraulic system of the spacecraft.
A significant complication of the design of the fuel continuity means occurs in the presence of several factors that are present when a spacecraft performs a flight task: multiple launch and stop of the propulsion system, performing complex maneuvers under conditions of multidirectional external force impulses, which is just inherent in spacecraft. The position uncertainty and heterogeneity of the boundaries between the boost gas and fuel components at the time of launching the propulsion system require additional measures to prevent premature gas breakthrough into the flow line with its subsequent entry into the propulsion system. Therefore, over more than five decades, fuel continuity tools have been developed , the operation of which is based on various principles. At the same time, capillary-type fuel continuity means are most widely used. During this time, the basic physical principles of the behavior of a liquid under the action of capillary forces under weightless conditions were studied, the main types of designs of means for ensuring fuel continuity were determined, and the range of tasks they solved was described.
|
| Keywords: accumulators, capillary fuel continuity means, capillary holding capacity, capillary pumps, chutes, collectors, mesh phase separators, vanes |
References:
1. Bagrov V. V., Kurpatenkov A. V., Polyaev V. M., et al. (1997). Capillary systems for extracting fluid from spacecraft tanks. Ed.V. M. Polyaev. M.: UNPC «Energomash», 328 p. [in Russian].
2. Belyaev N. M. (1983). Calculation of pneumohydraulic systems of rockets. M.: Mashinostroenie, 219 p. [in Russian].
3. Birkhoff G., Sarantanello E. (1964). Jets, traces and caverns. M.: Mir, 466 p. [in Russian].
4. Valov A. A., Savushkin N. F. (1987). Power systems using surface tension forces: a review based on foreign scientific, technical and patent information. Head Department of Scientific and Technical Information-4, Part. III, No. 20, 73 p. [in Russian].
5. Garkusha V. A., Shevchenko B. A., Rada N. A., Ovots N. A. (1983). Means for ensuring the continuity of fuel components of foreign spacecraft . Review based on materials from the open press for 1967-1981. Head Department of Scientific and Technical Information-3, Part. I, No. 229 (28), 44 p. [in Russian].
6. Golovko M. P. (2015). Merchandising of clothing fyl footwear products. Study guid. Kharkiv: Kharkiv. State Un-t of Food and Trade, 459 p. [in Ukrainian].
7. GOST 3187-76. Grids are wire woven filter. M.: Publ. house of standards, 1976. 6 p. [in Russian].
8. GOST 6613-86. Grids woven wire with square cells. M.: Publ. house of standards, 1986. 11 p. [in Russian].
9. Davydov S. A., Gorelova K. V. (2012). History of design improvement and prospects for the use of means to ensure fuel continuity based on capillary forces. Bull. Dnipropetrovsk Univ. Ser. history and philosophy of science and technology, 20, 160-164 [in Russian].
10. Kovalevsky M. M. (1970). Problems of temperature control of tanks under conditions of small overloads by draining a part of the component into the surrounding space: a review based on foreign press materials. Head Department of Scientific and Technical Information, No. 4, 48 p. [in Russian].
11. Kozlov A. A., et al. (1988). Power supply and control systems for liquid-propellant rocket propulsion systems. M.: Engineering, 352 p. [in Russian].
12. Kraev M. V., Kishkin A. A., Melkozerov M. G. (2002). Hydrodynamics of two-phase flow in the chamber of a passive phase separator. Univ. news. Aviation. technology, No. 3, 22-26 [in Russian].
13. Novikov Yu. M., Bol'shakov V. A. (2010). Combined porous mesh metals. Security in the technosphere, No. 5, 34-37 [in Russian].
14. Patent of Russia № 2165871. Grishin V. M., Podobedov G. G., Perfil'ev L. A., et al. A device for separating liquid and gas under weightlessness. Declared 04.17.2000, publ. 04.27.2001 [in Russian].
15. Platov I. V., Simonov A. V. (2016). Development of the design of propulsion systems and trajectories of spacecraft of the Laplace-II project for the study of the planetary system of Jupiter. Bull. SibGAU. Ser. Aviation and rocket-space technology, 17, No. 3, 710-721 [in Russian].
16. Platov I. V., Simonov A. V. (2018). Development of a propulsion system based on small thrust engines and a scheme for spacecraft flight to the center of the solar system. Sib. J. Sci. and Techn. Ser. Aviation and rocket-space technology, 19, No. 3, 517-525.
https://doi.org/10.31772/2587-6066-2018-19-3-517-525
17. Polukhin D. A., Oreshenko V. M., Morozov V. A. (1987). Development of pneumohydraulic systems of propulsion systems for launch vehicles and spacecraft with rocket engines. M.: Engineering, 248 р. [in Russian].
18. Ring E. (1968). Liquid propellant rocket propulsion systems. M.: Mіr, 404 p. [in Russian].
19. Sapozhnikov V. B., Krylov V. I., Novikov Yu. (2013). Ground testing of capillary phase separators based on combined porous- mesh materials for fuel tanks of liquid rocket engines of the upper stages of launch vehicles, upper stages and spacecraft. Eng. J.: Sci. and Innovation, No. 4, 1-15.
20. Sedikh I. V., Nazarenko D. S., Smolensky D. E. (2019). Features of experimental development of the process of deposition of fuel components in tanks of space rocket stages. Space technology. Rocket weapons, No. 2, 35-41.
https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2019.02.035
21. Sedich I. V. (2021). Selection of design parameters of inertial factors for ensuring the stability of fuel in the tanks of the space stages of launch vehicles: dis. cand. tech. Dnipro, 214 р. [in Russian].
22. Semenov Yu. P., Lozin-Lozinsky G. E., Lapygin V. L., Timchenko V. A. (1995). Buran reusable orbital ship. M.: Engineering, 447 p. [in Russian].
23. Chelomey V. N., Polukhin D. A., Mirkin N. N., Oreshchenko V. M., Usov G. L. (1978). Pneumohydraulic systems of propulsion systems with liquid rocket engines. M.: Engineering, 240 p. [in Russian].
24. Shevchenko B. A. (1990). Calculation and experimental method for the development of means for taking components from tanks of aircraft with a liquid rocket engine: diss. cand. tech. Dnepropetrovsk, 209 p. [in Russian].
25. Yanke E., Emde F., Lesh F. (1977). Special functions. M.: Nauka, 344 p. [in Russian].
26. Abrego A., Bair C., Hink A., et al. (1993). Project Hyreus. Mars sample retechnical specificationrn mission utilizing in sitechnical specification propellant production. Washington Univ.; Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, NASA-CR-197189, 383 p. [in English].
27. Behruzi P., Dodd C., Netter G. (2007). Future Propellant Management Device Concepts for Restartable Cryogenic Upper Stages. Joint Propulsion Conf. & Exhibit (8-11 July 2007, Cincinnati, OH). 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE, 8 p.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-5498
28. Behruzi P., Klatte J., Fries N., Netter G., Kranz T. (2012). Cryogenic Propellant Management during Ballistic Flight Phases. 48th Joint Propulsion Conf. & Exhibit (30 July - 01 August 2012, Atlanta, Georgia). AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE, 14 p.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-4047
29. Behruzi P., Klatte J., Fries N., Schütte A., Köhler H. (2013). Cryogenic Propellant Management Sounding Rocket Experiments on TEXUS 48. 49th Joint Propulsion Conf. (July 14-17, 2013, San Jose, CA). AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE, 19 p.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-3904
30. Bienhoff D. (2019). The future of commercial space transportation. URL: https://www.thespacereview.com/article/3776/1 (Last accessed: 06.06.2023).
31. Blackmon J. B. (1984). Collection of liquid propellant in zero gravity with electric forces. AIAA Paper, № 265, 391-398.
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.28190
32. Blatt M. H., Audelott J. C. (1976). Centaur propellant acquisition system. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 13, № 9, 515-521 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57116
33. Chapter J. J., Rider S. B. (1980). Surface tension propellant management system computerized flow analysis. AIAA Paper, № 1098. 8 p. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-1098 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-1098
34. Chato D. J. (2006). The Role of Flight Experiments in the Development of Cryogenic Fluid Management Technologies. Cryogenics, 46, No. 2-3, 82-88 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2005.11.010
35. DeBrock S. C. (1970). A survey of current developments in surface tension devices for propellant acquisition. AIAA Paper, № 685, 83-98.
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.30226
36. DeBrock S. C., Grove R. K. (1975). Capillary propellant management for integrated primary and secondary propulsion systems. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 12, No. 5, 261-270. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56972 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56972
37. Dowdy M. W., De-Brock S. C. (1973). Selection of a surface tension propellant management system for the Vicing-75 Orbiter. J. Spacecraft and Rockets. 10, No 9, 549-558 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61925
38. Ellion M. E., Trizell D. P., Mager E. (1977). An improved technique for propellant management for body stabilized spacecraft. AIAA Paper, № 850. 7 p. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1977-850 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1977-850
39. Fester D. A., Villlars A. D., Uney P. E. (1975). Surface tension propellant acquisition system technology for Space Shuttle reaction control tanks. AIAA Paper, No. 1196. 522-527. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57117 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57117
40. Gravlee M., Vera C., Wollen M., McLean C., Walls L. (2010). Micro-Gravity Cryogenic Experiment Opportunity. AIAA Paper, No 8838. 8 p. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-8838 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-8838
41. Hartwig J. W. (2017). Propellant Management Devices for Low-Gravity Fluid Management: Past, Present, and Future Applications. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 54, No 4, 808-824. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33750 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33750
42. Industrial woven wire cloth. Technical requirements and testing. ISO 9044:2016 [in English].
43. Jaekle D. E. Jr. (1991). Propellant Management Device Conceptual Design and Analysis: Vanes. 27th Joint Propulsion Conf. (June 24-26, 1991, Sacramento, CA, 13). AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE, AIAA-91-2172. 12 p.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1991-2172
44. Jaekle D. E. Jr. (1993). Propellant Management Device Conceptual Design and Analysis: Sponges. 29th Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit (June 28-30, 1993, Monterey, CA, 13). AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE, AIAA-93-1970. 13 p.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-1970
45. Jaekle D. E. Jr. (1995). Propellant Management Device Conceptual Design and Analysis: Traps and Troughs. 31th Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit (July 10-12, 1995, San Diego, CA, 13). AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE, AIAA-95-2531. 13 p.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1995-2531
46. Jaekle D. E. Jr. (1997). Propellant Management Device Conceptual Design and Analysis: Galleries. 33th Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit (July 6-9, 1997, Seattle, WA, 13). AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE, AIAA-97-2811. 13 p.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1997-2811
47. Kornuta D., Abbud-Madrid А., Atkinson J., et al. (2019). Commercial lunar propellant architectechnical specificationre. A collaborative stechnical specificationdy of lunar propellant production. 77 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reach.2019.100026 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reach.2019.100026
48. Kutter B., Zegler F., Sakla S., Wall J., Saks G., Duffey J., Hopkins J., Chato D. J. (2006). Settled Cryogenic Propellant Transfer. AIAA Paper, No 4436. 8 p. [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-4436
49. Levich V. G. (1962). Physicochemical Hydrodynamics. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 700 p. [in English].
50. Lunar market assessment: market trends and challenges in the development of a lunar economy. URL: https://www.pwc.com. au/industry/space-industry/lunar-marketassessment-2021.pdf (Last accessed: 06.06.2023) [in English].
51. Melcher J. R. (1969). Dielectroforetic liquid expulsion. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 6, No 9, 961-967 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.29740
52. Patent Bundesrepublik Deutschland № 2506489. Laaber D. G., Hivert A. P. Selbstentleerender Behalter fur Ranumfahrzenge. Declared 15.02.75; publ. 17.08.1978 [in German].
53. Patent USA № 3353350. Grove R. K., Collins W. S., DeBrock S. C. Sump for space vehicles. Declared 08.05.65; publ. 21.11.1967 [in English].
54. Regnier W. W., Hess D. A. (1978). Design and development of a passive propellant management system. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 15, No 5, 299-304 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57320
55. Rollins J., Grove R., Jaekle D. (1985). Twenty-three years of surface tension propellant management system design, development, manufacture, test, and operation. 21st Joint Propulsion Conf., 9 p. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1985-1199 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1985-1199
56. Sakla S., Kutter B., Wall J. (2006). Centaur Test Bed (CTB) for Cryogenic Fluid Management. AIAA Paper, № 4603. 5 p.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-4603
57. Schemes of types weaving of mesh screen. URL: https://www.marcospecialtysteel.com/wire-mesh-crimp-and-weave-styles/ (Last accessed: 06.06.2023).
58. Schutze H. (1982). Strukturmechanische auslegung des triebstofforder-ungssystems eines oberflachen spannungstanks. Zeitschrift für Flugwissenschaft und Weltraumforschung, 6, No 3, 160-167 [in English].
59. Snead J. M., Hellman B. H. (2007). Near-future reusable space logistics vehicles. 43rd Propulsion Conf. & Exhibit. AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-5847 [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-5847
60. Standard specification for industrial woven wire cloth. ASTM E 2016 - 20. 2020 [in English].
61. Standard guide for industrial woven wire filter cloth. ASTM E 2814 - 18. 2018 [in English].
62. Tam W., Behruzi P., Jaekle D., Netter G. (2016). The Evolutionary forces and the design and development of propellant management devices for space flight in europe and the united states. Space Propulsion, 25 p. [in English].
63. Tam W., Jaekle D. (2018). Review and history of ATK space systems surface tension PMD tanks. Space Propulsion, 24 p. [in English].
64. Tegart J. R., Wright N. T. (1983). Double perforated plate as a capillary barrier. 19th Joint Propulsion conf., No 1379, 7 p.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1983-1379
65. Zombie Satellites Return From the Graveyard. Mission Extension Vehicles give dead spacecraft a new lease on life.
URL: https://spectrum.ieee.org/zombie-satellites-return-from-the-graveyard#to... (Last accessed: 06.06.2023).