Morpho-physiological reactions of gravisensitivity and adaptation to UV-radiation of the moss Bryum Caespiticiumhedw. from Antarctica
Heading:
| 1Kyyak, NYa., 1Lobachevska, OV, 1Khorkavtsiv, Ya.D 1Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, L’viv, Ukraine |
| Space Sci. & Technol. 2021, 27 ;(5):047-059 |
| https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2021.05.047 |
| Publication Language: Ukrainian |
Abstract: The adaptive physiological reactions of the moss Bryum caespiticium Hedw. from Antarctica to the influence of UV radiation and gravimorphoses as a factor of adaptive plasticity, associated with environmental conditions, were studied. As a control, B. caespiticium plants were collected in the Nature Reserve “Roztochchia” (Lviv region). In investigations, we used a sterile laboratory culture of mosses grown under controlled conditions in a phytotron. Moss shoots were irradiated with UV rays generated by an ultraviolet lamp OSRAM with an intensity of 4 kW/m2, which caused 50 % inhibition of plant regeneration (ED50). Physiological parameters were determined 24 h after exposure to UV radiation.
The influence of gravity on the morphological form of B. caespiticium gametophyte turf and the interaction of light and gravity in gravi-/phototropism as a manifestation of gravimorphoses adaptability were analyzed. One of the objectives was to investigate the formation of gravimorphoses as a result of the initiation of cells’ branching processes and the formation of gametophore buds and to evaluate their role in the life cycle of B. caespiticium under extreme conditions. For this, we determined the branching coefficient of the gravitropic protonema, the inclination angle of the branches and the buds’ development depending on the interaction of photo- and gravitropism, under the influence of red and blue light, and the effect of UV on gravisensitivity.
The influence of physiologically active red and blue light on the branching activity and bud formation on the gravitropic protonema of the Antarctic moss B. caespiticium was investigated. It was found that red light mainly inhibited graviperception and gravitropic growth of protonemata cells, resulting in a change of the response to gravity, but initiated high branching activity and, accordingly, another morphological form of turf. After the influence of the blue light, intensive bud formation and gametophore development were observed. Thus, gravitation promoted morphological variability and changes in the functional activity of cells at the juvenile stage of the protonemata development, which is important for the survival of the moss under extreme environmental conditions. After UV irradiation the gravisensitivity of the B. caespiticium protonemata decreased. However, due to the resistance of the moss sample from Antarctica to the prolonged influence of UV rays, gravitropic growth was not completely blocked, as in plants from the Lviv region.
The effect of the ultraviolet irradiation on the antioxidant activity, the content of soluble (vacuolar) and cell wall-bound fractions of UV-absorbing phenolic components, flavonoids content and their absorption spectra, as well as the amount of carotenoids and anthocyanins in B. caespiticium shoots, were determined. It was established that B. caespiticium plants from Antarctica have 1.5 times higher antioxidant activity compared to plants from the Lviv region, which confirms the high level of protection against oxidative damage. UV irradiation activates the synthesis of UV-absorbing phenolic compounds in mosses. The shoots of B. caespiticium from Antarctica defined a higher content of phenols compared to samples from the Lviv region and their significant increase under the influence of UV radiation. The content of UV-absorbing compounds bound with the cell wall was higher than the concentration of soluble phenolic compounds, both in plants from Antarctica and in samples from the Lviv region, which indicates their participation in the mechanisms of cells protection from UV radiation.
It was shown that the influence of UV irradiation induced an increase of flavonoids’ content in the shoots of both samples of B. caespiticium, but for plants from Antarctica, the concentration of flavonoids after stress was 1.7 times higher than in plants from the Lviv region. The absorption spectra of flavonoids revealed flavonols rutin and quercetin and flavone luteolin in both samples of B. caespiticium, which provide effective cells absorption of UV rays. The higher content of anthocyanins and carotenoids in moss shoots from Antarctica both in the control sample and after the exposure to UV radiation promotes the protection against damage and formation of the adaptive potential.
|
| Keywords: Antarctica, antioxidant activity, flavonoids, gravi-dependent growth reactions, mosses, phenols, UV irradiation |
References:
1. Ahmad P., Jaleel C. A., Salem M. A., Nabi G., Sharma S. (2010). Roles of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit. Revs Biotechnology, 30, No 3, 161—175.
https://doi.org/10.3109/07388550903524243
2. Anahita A., Asmah R., Fauziah O. (2015). Evaluation of total phenolic content, total antioxidant activity, and antioxidant vitamin composition of pomegranate seed and juice. Int. Food Res. J., 22, 1212—1217.
https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-5146.1000164
3. Arnon D. (1949). Copper enzymes isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoloxidase in Betula vulgaris.Plant Physiology, 194, No 24,1—15.
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1
4. Bjorn L. O., Callaghan T. V., Gehrke C. (1998). The problem of ozone depletion in northern Europe. Ambio, 27, 275—279.
5. Bobo-Garcha G., Davidov-Pardo G., Arroqui,C. (2015). Intra-laboratory validation of microplate methods for total phenolic content and antioxidant activity on polyphenolic extracts, and comparison with conventional spectrophotometric methods. J. Sci. Food Agric., 95, No 1, 204—209.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6706
6. Brand-Williams W., Cuvelier M. E., Berset C. (1995). Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT –Food Science and Technology, 28, No 1, 25—30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
7. Clarke L. J., Robinson S. A. (2008). Cell wall-bound ultraviolet-screening compounds explain the high ultraviolet tolerance of the Antarctic moss, Ceratodon purpureus. New Phytologist, 179, 776—783.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02499.x
8. Cruz de Carvalho R., Catalá M., Branquinho C., Marques da Silva J., Barreno E. (2017). Dehydration rate determines the degree of membrane damage and desiccation tolerance in bryophytes. Physiol. plant., 159, No 3. 277—289.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12511
9. Demkiv O. T., Khorkavtsiv Y. D., Kyyak N. Y., Kit N. A. (2005). Influence of gravity on photomorphogenesis of protonema Pottia intermedia (Turn.) Furnr., Pottiales. Ukr. bot. J., 62, No 3, 329—337 [in Ukrainian].
10. Dmytriiev O. P. Poliakovskyi S. O. (2007). UV-B radiation and plants. Bull. Kharkiv Nat. Agrarian Univ. Biology ser., 1, No 10, 7—23. [in Ukrainian].
11. Dey A., De J. N. (2012). Antioxidative potential of bryophytes: Stress tolerance and commercial perspectives: A Review. Pharmacologia, 3, 151—159.
https://doi.org/10.5567/pharmacologia.2012.151.159
12. Dixon R. A., Paiva N. L. (1995). Stress-Induced Phenylpropanoid Metabolism. Plant Cell., 7, 1085—1097.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3870059
13. Fabon G., Monforte L., Tomas-Las-Heras R, Niсez-Olivera E, Martinez-Abaigar J. (2012). Dynamic response of UV-absorbing compounds, quantum yield and the xanthophyll cycle to diel changes in UV-B and photosynthetic radiations in an aquatic liverwort. J. Plant Physiology, 169, 20—26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2011.08.010
14. Glime J. M. (2006). Bryophyte ecology. Vol. 1. Physiological ecology. URL: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyteecology/ (Last accessed 15.06.2021) [in English].
15. Hollozy F. (2002). Effects of ultraviolet radiation on plant cells. Micron.,33, 179—197.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-4328(01)00011-7
16. Iqbal Z., Javed M., Gull S., Mahmood M. H.-R., Hai Z. (2019). Total phenolic contents of two varieties of Crocus sativus and their antioxidant activity. Int. J. Biosciences, 14, No 3, 128—132.
https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/14.3.128-132
17. Jansen M. A. K., Urban O. (2019). Plant Responses to UV-B Radiation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0027966
18. Jovanovic S. V. (1994). Flavonoids as antioxidants. J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 116, No 11, 4846—4851.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00090a032
19. Khorkavtsiv Y. D., Kordyum E. L., Lobachevska O. V., Kyyak N. Y., Kit N. A. (2015). Branching of Ceratodon purpureus protonemata effected under altered gravity conditions. Ukr. bot. J., 72, No 6, 588—595.
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj72.06.588
20. Kordyum E., Borisova T., Krisanova N., Pozdnyakova N., Shevchenko G., Kozeko L., Romanchuk S., Lobachevska O., Charkavtsiv Ya., Kyyak N., Zaimenko N., Ivanytska B., Brykov V., Mischenko L. (2021). Space biology: results and prospects. Space Res. in Ukraine. 2018–2020. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka
21. Kordyum E., Hasenstein K. (2021). Plant biology for space exploration — Building on the past, preparing for the future. Life Sci. Space Res., 29, 1—7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lssr.2021.01.003
22. Kyyak N. Y., Khorkavtsiv Y. D. (2016). Estimation of the oxidative stress in moss Pohlia nutans (Hedw.) Lindb. depending on the influence of gravity. Space Sci. and Technol.,22, No 4, 58—66.
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2016.04.058 [in Ukrainian].
23. Kyyak N. Y., Lobachevska O. V., Rabyk I. V., Kyyak V. H. (2020). Role of the bryophytes in substrate revitalization on a post-technogenic salinized territory. Biosystems Diversity, 28, No 4, 419—425.
https://doi.org/10.15421/012054
24. Lobachevska O., Kyjak N., Khorkavtsiv O., Dovgalyuk A., Kit N., Klyuchivska O., Cove D. (2005). Influence of metabolic stress on the inheritance of cell determination in the moss. Pottia intermedia. Cell Biology Int., 29, No 3, 181—186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.02.001
25. Lobachevska O. V., Kyyak N. Y., Kordyum E. L., Khorkavtsiv Y. D. (2021). The role of gravimorphoses in moss adaptation to extreme environment. Ukr. Bot. J., 78, No 1, 69—79.
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj78.01.069
26. Lobachevska O. V., Kyyak N. Y., Rabyk I. V. (2019). Ecological and physiological peculiarities of bryophytes on a post-technogenic salinized territory. Biosystems Diversity, 27, No 4, 342—348.
https://doi.org/10.15421/011945
27. Medina R., Liu Y., Li-Song W., Shuiliang G., Hylander K., Goffinet B. (2015). DNA based revised geographic circumscription of species of Physcomitrella (Funariaceae): P. patens new to East Asia and P. magdalenae new to East Africa. Bryologist,118, No 1, 22—31.
http://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-118.1.022
28. Michalak A. (2010). Phenolic Compounds and Their Antioxidant Activity in Plants Growing under Heavy Metal Stress. Polish J. Environmental Studies, 15, 523—530
29. Newsham K. K. (2010). The biology and ecology of the liverwort Cephaloziella varians in Antarctica. Antarct. Sci., 22,131—43.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102009990630
30. Newsham K. K., Robinson S. A. (2009). Responses of plants in Polar Regions to UV-B exposure: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 15, No 11, 2574—2589.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01944.x
31. Nikolaichuk V. I., Belchhazi V. Y., Bilyk P. P. (2000). Special workshop on plant physiology and biochemistry. Uzhhorod [in Ukrainian].
32. Pękal A., Pyrzynska K. (2014). Evaluation of aluminium complexation reaction for flavonoid content assay. Food Analytical Methods, 7, 1776—1782.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-014-9814-x
33. Pizarro M., Rodrigo A., Contreras H., K öhler G., Zúñiga E. (2019). Desiccation tolerance in the Antarctic moss Sanionia uncinata. Biological Res., 52, No 46, 1—11.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-019-0251-6
34. Robinson S. A., Wasley J., Tobin A. K. (2003). Living on the edge – plants and global change in continental and maritime Antarctica. Global Change Biology, 9, No 12, 1681—1717.
http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00693.x
35. Robinson S. A., Waterman M. J. (2014). Sunsafe bryophytes: Photoprotection from excess and damaging solar radiation.Photosynthesis in Bryophytes and Early Land Plants. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration (Including Bioenergy and Related Processes). Eds D. Hanson, S. Rice. Dordrecht: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6988-5_7
36. Schnitzler J. P., Jungblut T. P., Heller W., Koerlein M., Hutzler P., Heinzmann U., Schmelzer E., Ernst D., Langebartels C., Sandermann H. (1996). Tissue localization of UV-B-screening pigments and of chalcone synthase mRNA in needles of Scots pine seedlings. New Phytol., 132, 247—258.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01844.x
37. Semerdjieva S. I., Phoenix G. K., Hares D., Gwynn J. D., Callaghan T. V., Sheeld E. (2003). Surface morphology, leaf and cuticle thickness of four dwarf shrubs from a subArctic heath following long-term exposure to enhanced levels of UV-B.Physiol. plant., 117, 289—294.
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00006.x
38. Smith R. I. (2005). The bryophyte flora of geothermal habitats on Deception Island, Antarctica. J. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 46, 233—248
39. Soriano G., Fabón G., Monforte L., Séneca A., Söderström L., Martinez-Abaigar J., Núñez-Olivera E. (2013). Ultraviolet absorption capacity of sphagnum species from norwegian peatlands. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Briología, 40, 1–10.URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259460785
40. Sroka Z. (2005). Antioxidative and antiradical properties of plant phenolics. J. Biosciences, 60, 833—843.
https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2005-11-1204
41. Stark L. R. (2017). Ecology of desiccation tolerance in bryophytes: A conceptual framework and methodology. The Bryologist. 120, No 2, 130—165.
https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-120.2.130
42. Zabel P., Bamsey M., Schubert D., Tajmar M. (2016). Review and analysis of over 40 years of space plant growth systems.Life Sci. Space Res., 10, 1—16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lssr.2016.06.004
43. Zhao J., Dixon, R. A. (2013). MATE transporters facilitate vacuolar uptake of epicatechin 3 ′-O-glucoside for proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell., 21, 2323—2340.