Methods for the identification of magnetosphere regions based on spacecraft data: experimental criteriaand empirical modelling
Heading:
1Verkhoglyadova, OP, 2Ivchenko, VM 1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine 2Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Physical Faculty, Kyiv, Ukraine |
Kosm. nauka tehnol. 1998, 4 ;(5):18–27 |
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit1998.05.018 |
Publication Language: Ukrainian |
Abstract: Problems arising in the analysis of spacecraft measurements made in the Earth's magnetosphere are discussed. Data processing should take into account the properties of plasma regions where the measurements were made. We give an overview of the most widely used experimental criteria, empirical models, and the features assumed to be characteristic of the magnetosphere regions. Preliminary scheme of the data analysis from the viewpoint of space physics is sketched. The study was made in the framework of the Interball-Tail data processing.
|
Keywords: Earth's magnetosphere, Interball-Tail, spacecraft measurements |
References:
1. Evdokimov V. P., Pokras V. M. Methods of data reduction in scientific cosmic experiments, 176 p. (Nauka, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].
2. Ostapenko A. A., Mal'tsev Yu. P., Mal'kov M. V. Magnetic field model in the internal Earth magnetosphere. Geomagnetizm i Aehronomiya, 36 (5), 35—42 (1996) [in Russian].
3. Akasofu S.-I. The magnetospheric currents: an introduction. In: Magnetospheric currents, Ed. by T. A. Potemra, P. 29. (Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 28) (Washington, 1984).
4. Angelopoulos V., Mitchell D. G., Willams D. J., et al. Growth and evolution of a plasmoid associated with a small, isolated substorm: IMP-8 and GEOTAIL measurements in the magnetotail. Geophys. Res. Lett., 22 (22), 3011 (1995).
https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL03133
https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL03133
5. Bame S. J., Smith E. J., Ogilvie E., et al. Plasma regimes in the deep geomagnetic tail: ISEE 3. Geophys. Res. Lett., 10 (9), 912 (1983).
https://doi.org/10.1029/GL010i009p00912
https://doi.org/10.1029/GL010i009p00912
6. Behannon K. W. Geometry of the geomagnetic tail. J. Geophys. Res., 75, 743 (1970).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA075i004p00743
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA075i004p00743
7. Christon S. P., Eastman T. E., Doke T., et al. Magnetospheric plasma regimes identified using Geotail measurements. 2. Statistics, spatial distribution, and geomagnetic dependence. J. Geophys. Res., 103, (A10), 23521—23542 (1998).
https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA01914
https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA01914
8. Christon S. P., Gloeckler G., Eastman T. E., et al. Average energetic ion flux variation associated with geomagnetic activity from EPIC/STICS on GEOTAIL. J. Geophys. Res., 98A (12), 21421 (1993).
9. Cowley S. W. H., Hynds R. J., Richardson J. G., et al. Energetic ion regimes in the deep geomagnetic tail: ISEE 3. Geophys. Res. Lett., 11 (3), 275 (1984).
https://doi.org/10.1029/GL011i003p00275
https://doi.org/10.1029/GL011i003p00275
10. Crooker N. U., Siscoe G. L., Russell C. T., Smith E. J. Factors controlling degree of correlation between ISEE 1 and ISEE 3 interplanetary magnetic field measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 87A (4), 2224—2230 (1982).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA04p02224
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA04p02224
11. Eastman T. E., Christon S. P., Doke T., et al. Magnetospheric plasma regimes identified using Geotail measurements. 1. Regime identification and distant tail variability. J. Geophys. Res., 103 (A10), 23503—23520 (1998).
https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA01915
https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA01915
12. Eastman T. E., Roelof E. C., Criston S. P., et al. Energetic proton flux anisotropy in the Earth's magneto tail. 2: Geotail EPIC observations. J. Geophys. Res. (1997).
13. Elphinstone R. D., Hearn D., Murphree J. S., Cogger L. L. Mapping using the Tsyganenko long magnetospheric model and its relationship to Viking auroral images. J. Geophys. Res., 96A (4), 1467 (1991).
https://doi.org/10.1029/90JA01625
https://doi.org/10.1029/90JA01625
14. Fairfield D. H. Average and unusual location of the Earth's magnetopause and bow shock. J. Geophys. Res., 76 (28), 6700—6716 (1971).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA076i028p06700
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA076i028p06700
15. Fairfield D. H. On the structure of the distant magnetotail: ISEE 3. J. Geophys. Res., 97A (2), 1403 (1992).
https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA02388
https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA02388
16. Fairfield D. H. Solar wind control of the distant magnetotail: ISEE 3. J. Geophys. Res., 98A (12), 21265 (1993).
https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA01847
https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA01847
17. Fairfield D. H., Acuna M. H., Zanetti L. J., Potemra T. A. The magnetic field of the equatorial magnetotail: AMPTE/CCE observations at R < 8.8 Re. J. Geophys. Res., 92, 7432 (1987).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA07p07432
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA07p07432
18. Farris M. H., Petrinec S. M., Russell C. T. The thickness of the magnetosheath: constraints on the polytropic index. Geophys. Res. Lett., 18 (10), 1821 (1991).
https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL02090
https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL02090
19. Feldstein Y. I. and Elphinstone R. D. Aurorae and the large-scale structure of the magnetosphere. J. Geomagn. and Geoelec., 44, 1159 (1992).
https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.44.1159
https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.44.1159
20. Feldstein Ya. I., Galperin Yu. I. The auroral luminosity structure in the high-latitude upper atmosphere: its dynamics and relationship to the large-scale structure of the Earth's magnetosphere. Rev. Geophys., 23 (3), 217 (1985).
https://doi.org/10.1029/RG023i003p00217
https://doi.org/10.1029/RG023i003p00217
21. Gosling J. T., McComas D. J., Thomsen M. F., et al. The warped neutral sheet in the near-Earth geomagnetic tail. J. Geophys. Res., 91, 7093 (1986).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA091iA06p07093
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA091iA06p07093
22. Heikkila W. J. Magnetospheric topology of fields and currents. In: Magnetospheric currents, Ed. by T. A. Potemra, P. 208 (Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 28) (Washington, 1984).
https://doi.org/10.1029/gm028p0208
https://doi.org/10.1029/gm028p0208
23. Jordan S. E. Empirical models of the magnetospheric magnetic field. Rev. Geophys., 32 (2), 139—157 (1994).
https://doi.org/10.1029/94RG00100
https://doi.org/10.1029/94RG00100
24. Kaufmann R. L., Larson D. J., Beidl P., Lu C. Mapping and energization in the magnetotail. 1. Magnetospheric boundaries. J. Geophys. Res., 98 (A6), 9307 (1993).
https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA00304
https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA00304
25. Lopez R. E. The position of the magnetotail neutral sheet in the near-Earth region. Geophys. Res. Lett., 17 (10), 1617 (1990).
https://doi.org/10.1029/GL017i010p01617
https://doi.org/10.1029/GL017i010p01617
26. Moses and Owen. Plasma tail twisting and bending. Third International Conference on Substorms (ICS-3), Versailles, France, 12—17 May 1996 (1996).
27. Peredo M., Stern D. P. On the position of the near-Earth neutral sheet: a comparison of magnetic model predictions with empirical formulas. J. Geophys. Res., 96, All., 19521 (1991).
28. Petrinec S. M., Russell C. T. An empirical model of the size and shape of the near-Earth magnetotail. Geophys. Res. Lett., 20 (23), 2695 (1993).
https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL02847
https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL02847
29. Pulkkinen T. I., Baker D. N., Walker R. J., et al. Comparison of empirical magnetic field models and global MHD simulations: The near-tail currents. Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 675 (1995).
https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00540
30. Roelof E. C., Sibeck D. G. Magnetopause shape as a bivariate function of interplanetary magnetic field Bz and solar wind dynamic pressure. J. Geophys. Res., 98A (12), 21421 (1993).
30. Roelof E. C., Sibeck D. G. Magnetopause shape as a bivariate function of interplanetary magnetic field Bz and solar wind dynamic pressure. J. Geophys. Res., 98A (12), 21421 (1993).
https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02362
31. Sibeck D. G., Lopez R. E., Roelof E. C. Solar wind control of the magnetopause shape, location and motion. J. Geophys. Res., 96A (4), 5489—5495 (1991).
https://doi.org/10.1029/90JA02464
31. Sibeck D. G., Lopez R. E., Roelof E. C. Solar wind control of the magnetopause shape, location and motion. J. Geophys. Res., 96A (4), 5489—5495 (1991).
https://doi.org/10.1029/90JA02464
32. Sibeck D. G., Siscoe G. L., Slavin J. A., et al. The distant magnetotail's response to a strong interplanetary magnetic field By: twisting, flattening and field line bending. J. Geophys. Res., 90A (5), 4011 (1985).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA05p04011
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA05p04011
33. Stasiewicz K. Polar cusp topology and position as a function of interplanetary magnetic field and magnetic activity: Comparison of a model with "Viking" and other observations. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 15789—15800 (1991).
https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA01420
https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA01420
34. Stern D. P. The art of mapping the magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 17169 (1994).
https://doi.org/10.1029/94JA01239
https://doi.org/10.1029/94JA01239
35. Tsurutani B. T., Slavin J. A., Smith E. J., et al. Magnetic structure of the distant geotail from -60 to -220 Re: ISEE-3. Geophys. Res. Lett., 11 (1), P. 1 (1984).
https://doi.org/10.1029/GL011i001p00001
https://doi.org/10.1029/GL011i001p00001
36. Tsyganenko N. A. Modeling the Earth's magnetospheric magnetic field confined within a realistic magnetopause. J. Geophys. Res., 100A (4), 5599—5612 (1995).
https://doi.org/10.1029/94JA03193
https://doi.org/10.1029/94JA03193
37. Tsyganenko N. A., Stern D. P. A new-generation global magnetosphere field model, based on spacecraft magnetometer data. ISTP Newsletter, 6 (1), 21 (1996).
38. Yamamoto T., Shiokawa K., Kokubun S. Magnetic field structures of the magnetotail as observed by GEOTAIL. Geophys. Res. Lett., 21 (25), 2875 (1994).
https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01609
https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01609
39. Zhang X. X., Song P., Stahara S. S., et al. Large scale structures in the magnetosheath: exogenous or endogenous in origin. Geophys. Res. Lett., 23 (1), 105 (1996).
https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL03503
https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL03503
40. Zwickl R. D., Bakers D. N., Bame S. J., et al. Evolution of the Earth's distant magnetotail: ISEE 3 electron plasma results. J. Geophys. Res., 89A (12), 11007 (1984).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA089iA12p11007
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA089iA12p11007
41. Zwolakowska D., Popielawska B. Tail plasma domains and the auroral oval — results of mapping based on the Tsyganenko 1989 magnetosphere model. J. Geomagn. and Geoelec., 44, 1145 (1992).
https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.44.1145