A Text-Mining-Based Scientometric Analysis of Sunspot Number Prediction
Heading:
| 1Rodríguez, J-V, 2Carrasco, VMS, 3Rodríguez-Rodríguez, I 1Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Polytechnic University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain; Department of Computer Engineering, University of Alcalá, 2lcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain 2Department of Physics, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain; Institute for Water Research, Climate Change and Sustainability, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain 3Department of Communications Engineering, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain |
| Space Sci. & Technol. 2025, 31 ;(3):03-27 |
| https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2025.03.003 |
| Publication Language: English |
Abstract: The activity of the Sun is a substantial driver of both the terrestrial and space environments, making the study and prediction of solar activity and its cycles crucial. Of particular importance is predicting the sunspot number index (SN); this parameter, referring to the number of sunspots and sunspot groups on the Sun’s photosphere, is a critical indicator of solar activity. With solar storms adversely affecting power grids, satellite operations, and communication systems, the ability to predict SN with reasonable accuracy is exceptionally helpful. As a consequence, there has been growing academic interest in forecasting SN and its behavior, with a variety of methodologies being applied to the problem. However, the rapid increase in the number of publications is making it difficult to have a clear overview regarding the most novel or prolific topics, as well as the most prominent authors or countries in the field. In this work, we use text mining to conduct a scientometric analysis of extant scientific literature on sunspot number prediction since 1927.
Using VOSviewer software and Scopus data, we elucidate how the literature in this research field has evolved, showing the publications in terms of their country of origin (including co-authorship), source of publication, most relevant topics, and most cited elements based on journal and author. Our findings show that sunspot prediction (especially regarding SN) is an established field that is gaining renewed interest due to its important contribution to our knowledge of solar activity.
|
| Keywords: Sunspot number prediction; Solar activity; Scientometrics; Text mining |
References:
1. Abdusamatov K. I. (2007). Optimal prediction of the peak of the next 11-year activity cycle and of the peaks of several succeeding cycles on the basis of long-term variations in the solar radius or solar constant. Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, 23(3), 97-100.
https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591307030026
2. Ahluwalia H. S. (2022). Forecast for sunspot cycle 25 activity. Adv. Space Res., 69(1), 794-797.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.09.035
https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591307030026
2. Ahluwalia H. S. (2022). Forecast for sunspot cycle 25 activity. Adv. Space Res., 69(1), 794-797.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.09.035
3. Ahluwalia H. S., Jackiewicz J. (2012). Sunspot cycle 23 descent to an unusual minimum and forecasts for cycle 24 activit Adv. Space Res., 50(6), 662-668.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.04.023
4. Ahmad M., Batcha M. S. (2019). Mapping of Publications Productivity on Journal of Documentation 1989-2018: A Study Based on Clarivate Analytics - Web of Science Database. Library Philosophy and Practice (E-Journal), 2213.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3542853
5. Aksnes D. W., Sivertsen G. (2019). A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science. J. Data Inf. Sci., 4, 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0001
6. Ardalani-Farsa M., Zolfaghari S. (2010). Chaotic time series prediction with residual analysis method using hybrid Elman- NARX neural networks. Neurocomputing, 73(13-15), 2540-2553.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2010.06.004
7. Arlt R., Vaquero J. M. (2020). Historical sunspot records. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 17, 1.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-020-0023-y
8. Asikainen T., Mantere J. (2022). Prediction of even and odd sunspot cycles. Solar Phys.
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2377445/v1
9. Attia A. F., Ismail H. A., Basurah H. M. (2013). A Neuro-Fuzzy modeling for prediction of solar cycles 24 and 25. Astrophys. and Space Sci., 344, 5-11.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-012-1300-6
10. Baas J., Schotten M., Plume A., Côté G., Karimi R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant. Sci. Studies, 1(1), 377-386.
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
11. Babu C. N., Reddy B. E. (2014). A moving-average filter based hybrid ARIMA-ANN model for forecasting time series data. Appl. Soft Computing, 23, 27-38.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.028
12. Beer J., Mende W., Stellmacher R. (2000). The role of the Sun in climate forcing. Quaternary Sci. Rev., 19(1-5), 403-415.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00072-4
13. Bhowmik P., Nandy D. (2018). Prediction of the strength and timing of sunspot cycle 25 reveal decadal-scale space environmental conditions. Nature communications, 9(1), 5209.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07690-0
14. Blondel V. D., Guillaume J., Lambiotte R., Lefebvre E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Statist. Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10008.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
15. Boteler D. H. (2019). A 21st century view of the March 1989 magnetic storm. Space Weather, 17(10), 1427-1441.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002278
16. Bothmer V., Daglis I. A. (2007). Space weather: physics and effects. Springer: Science & Business Media.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34578-7
17. Broadus R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of "bibliometrics". Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 373-379.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
18. Caligari P., Moreno-Insertis F., Schussler M. (1995). Emerging flux tubes in the solar convection zone. 1: Asymmetry, tilt, and emergence latitude. Astrophys. J., Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), 441(2), 886-902.
https://doi.org/10.1086/175410
19. Cao L. (2003). Support vector machines experts for time series forecasting. Neurocomputing, 51, 321-339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00577-5
20. Carrasco V. M. S., Gallego M. C., Vaquero J. M. (2020). Number of sunspot groups from the Galileo - Scheiner controversy revisited. Mon. Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc., 496, 2482.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1633
21. Chandra R., Zhang M. (2012). Cooperative coevolution of Elman recurrent neural networks for chaotic time series prediction. Neurocomputing, 86, 116-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2012.01.014
22. Charbonneau P. (2020). Dynamo models of the solar cycle. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 17, 4.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-020-00025-6
23. Chatzistergos T., Ermolli I., Giorgi F., Krivova N. A., Puiu C. C. (2020). Modelling solar irradiance from ground-based photometric observations. J. Space Weather and Space Climate, 10, 45.
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020047
24. Chellappandi P., Vijayakumar C. S. (2018). Bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics/cybermetrics, informetrics and altmetrics- an emerging field in library and information science research. Shanlax Int. J. Education, 7(1), 5-8.
http/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2529398
25. Choudhuri A. R., Chatterjee P., Jiang J. (2007). Predicting solar cycle 24 with a solar dynamo model. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98(13), 131103.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.131103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.04.023
4. Ahmad M., Batcha M. S. (2019). Mapping of Publications Productivity on Journal of Documentation 1989-2018: A Study Based on Clarivate Analytics - Web of Science Database. Library Philosophy and Practice (E-Journal), 2213.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3542853
5. Aksnes D. W., Sivertsen G. (2019). A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science. J. Data Inf. Sci., 4, 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0001
6. Ardalani-Farsa M., Zolfaghari S. (2010). Chaotic time series prediction with residual analysis method using hybrid Elman- NARX neural networks. Neurocomputing, 73(13-15), 2540-2553.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2010.06.004
7. Arlt R., Vaquero J. M. (2020). Historical sunspot records. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 17, 1.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-020-0023-y
8. Asikainen T., Mantere J. (2022). Prediction of even and odd sunspot cycles. Solar Phys.
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2377445/v1
9. Attia A. F., Ismail H. A., Basurah H. M. (2013). A Neuro-Fuzzy modeling for prediction of solar cycles 24 and 25. Astrophys. and Space Sci., 344, 5-11.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-012-1300-6
10. Baas J., Schotten M., Plume A., Côté G., Karimi R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant. Sci. Studies, 1(1), 377-386.
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
11. Babu C. N., Reddy B. E. (2014). A moving-average filter based hybrid ARIMA-ANN model for forecasting time series data. Appl. Soft Computing, 23, 27-38.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.028
12. Beer J., Mende W., Stellmacher R. (2000). The role of the Sun in climate forcing. Quaternary Sci. Rev., 19(1-5), 403-415.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00072-4
13. Bhowmik P., Nandy D. (2018). Prediction of the strength and timing of sunspot cycle 25 reveal decadal-scale space environmental conditions. Nature communications, 9(1), 5209.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07690-0
14. Blondel V. D., Guillaume J., Lambiotte R., Lefebvre E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Statist. Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10008.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
15. Boteler D. H. (2019). A 21st century view of the March 1989 magnetic storm. Space Weather, 17(10), 1427-1441.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002278
16. Bothmer V., Daglis I. A. (2007). Space weather: physics and effects. Springer: Science & Business Media.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34578-7
17. Broadus R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of "bibliometrics". Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 373-379.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
18. Caligari P., Moreno-Insertis F., Schussler M. (1995). Emerging flux tubes in the solar convection zone. 1: Asymmetry, tilt, and emergence latitude. Astrophys. J., Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), 441(2), 886-902.
https://doi.org/10.1086/175410
19. Cao L. (2003). Support vector machines experts for time series forecasting. Neurocomputing, 51, 321-339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00577-5
20. Carrasco V. M. S., Gallego M. C., Vaquero J. M. (2020). Number of sunspot groups from the Galileo - Scheiner controversy revisited. Mon. Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc., 496, 2482.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1633
21. Chandra R., Zhang M. (2012). Cooperative coevolution of Elman recurrent neural networks for chaotic time series prediction. Neurocomputing, 86, 116-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2012.01.014
22. Charbonneau P. (2020). Dynamo models of the solar cycle. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 17, 4.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-020-00025-6
23. Chatzistergos T., Ermolli I., Giorgi F., Krivova N. A., Puiu C. C. (2020). Modelling solar irradiance from ground-based photometric observations. J. Space Weather and Space Climate, 10, 45.
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020047
24. Chellappandi P., Vijayakumar C. S. (2018). Bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics/cybermetrics, informetrics and altmetrics- an emerging field in library and information science research. Shanlax Int. J. Education, 7(1), 5-8.
http/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2529398
25. Choudhuri A. R., Chatterjee P., Jiang J. (2007). Predicting solar cycle 24 with a solar dynamo model. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98(13), 131103.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.131103
26. Chowdhury P., Jain R., Ray P. C., Burud D., Chakrabarti A. (2021). Prediction of amplitude and timing of solar cycle 25. Solar Phys., 296(4), 69.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01791-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01791-8
27. Cid C., Palacios J., Saiz E., Guerrero A., Cerrato Y. (2014). On extreme geomagnetic storms. J. Space Weather and SpaceClimate, 4, A28.
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014026
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014026
28. Clette F., Lefèvre L., Chatzistergos T., Hayakawa H., Carrasco V. M. S., et al. (2023). Re-calibration of the Sunspot Number: Status Report. Solar Phys., 298, 44.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-023-02136-3
29. Clette F., Svalgaard L., Vaquero J. M., Cliver E. W. (2014). Revisiting the sunspot number. A 400-year perspective on the Solar Cycle. Space Sci. Rev., 186, 35.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0074-2
30. Coban G. C., Raheem Au., Cavus H. (2021). Can Solar Cycle 25 be a new Dalton Minimum? Solar Phys., 296, 156.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01906-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-023-02136-3
29. Clette F., Svalgaard L., Vaquero J. M., Cliver E. W. (2014). Revisiting the sunspot number. A 400-year perspective on the Solar Cycle. Space Sci. Rev., 186, 35.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0074-2
30. Coban G. C., Raheem Au., Cavus H. (2021). Can Solar Cycle 25 be a new Dalton Minimum? Solar Phys., 296, 156.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01906-1
31. Covas E., Peixinho N., Fernandes J. (2019). Neural network forecast of the sunspot butterfly diagram. Solar Phys., 294(3),24.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1412-z
32. Dang Y., Chen Z., Li H., Shu H. (2022). A comparative study of non-deep learning, deep learning, and ensemble learningmethods for sunspot number prediction. Appl. Artificial Intelligence, 36(1), 2074129.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2022.2074129
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1412-z
32. Dang Y., Chen Z., Li H., Shu H. (2022). A comparative study of non-deep learning, deep learning, and ensemble learningmethods for sunspot number prediction. Appl. Artificial Intelligence, 36(1), 2074129.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2022.2074129
33. Dani T., Sulistiani S. (2019). Prediction of maximum amplitude of solar cycle 25 using machine learning. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.1231, No. 1, 012022. IOP Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1231/1/012022
34. Duvall T. L., Jeffferies S. M., Harvey J. W., Pomerantz M. A. (1993). Time-distance helioseismology. Nature, 362(6419), 430-432.
https://doi.org/10.1038/362430a0
35. Du Z., Du S. (2006). The relationship between the amplitude and descending time of a solar activity cycle. Solar Phys., 238, 431-437.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-006-0175-5
36. Eddy J. A. (1976). The Maunder Minimum: The reign of Louis XIV appears to have been a time of real anomaly in the behavior of the Sun. Science, 192(4245), 1189-1202.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.192.4245.1189
37. Efimenko V. M., Lozitsky V. G. (2023). Solar cycle 25 amplitude prediction based on sunspot number increase rate. Adv. Space Res., 72(4), 1448-1453.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.006
38. Forgács-Dajka E., Dobos L., Ballai I. (2021). Time-dependent properties of sunspot groups - I. Lifetime and asymmetric evolution. Astron. and Astrophys., 653, A50.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140731
39. Gleissberg W. (1971). The probable behaviour of sunspot cycle 21. Solar Phys., 21, 240-245.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155794
40. Gopalswamy N., M@kel@ P., Yashiro S., Akiyama S. (2018). Long-term solar activity studies using microwave imaging observations and prediction for cycle 25. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 176, 26-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.04.005
41. Gopinath S., Prince P. R. (2018). Prediction of future evolution of solar cycle 24 using machine learning techniques. Proc. Int. Astron. Union, 13(S340), 317-318.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921318001485
42. Gray L. J., Beer J., Geller M., Haigh J. D., Lockwood M., Matthes K., ..., White W. (2010). Solar influences on climate Rev. Geophys., 48(4).
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000282
43. Guo W., Jiang J., Wang J. X. (2021). A dynamo-based prediction of solar cycle 25. Solar Phys., 296, 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01878-2
44. Haigh J. D. (2007). The Sun and the Earth's Climate. Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 4, 2. DOI: 10.12942/lrsp-2007-2.
https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2007-2
45. Hale G. E. (1908). On the probable existence of a magnetic field in Sun-spots. Contributions from the Mount Wilson Observatory/ Carnegie Institution of Washington, No. 30, 1-29.
https://doi.org/10.1086/141602
46. Halevi G., Moed H., Bar-Ilan J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation - Review of the literature. J. Informetrics, 11(3), 823-834.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.005
47. Han M., Wang Y. (2009). Analysis and modeling of multivariate chaotic time series based on neural network. Expert Systemswith Applications, 36(2), 1280-1290.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.057
48. Han M., Xi J., Xu S., Yin F. L. (2004). Prediction of chaotic time series based on the recurrent predictor neural network. IEEE Trans. on signal processing, 52(12), 3409-3416.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2004.837418
49. Han Y. B., Yin Z. Q. (2019). A decline phase modeling for the prediction of solar cycle 25. Solar Phys., 294, 107.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1494-7
50. Hathaway D. H. (2015). The solar cycle. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 12, 1.
https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-4
51. Hathaway D. H., Wilson R. M. (2004). What the sunspot record tells us about space climate. Solar Phys., 224(1-2), 5-19.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-005-3996-8
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1231/1/012022
34. Duvall T. L., Jeffferies S. M., Harvey J. W., Pomerantz M. A. (1993). Time-distance helioseismology. Nature, 362(6419), 430-432.
https://doi.org/10.1038/362430a0
35. Du Z., Du S. (2006). The relationship between the amplitude and descending time of a solar activity cycle. Solar Phys., 238, 431-437.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-006-0175-5
36. Eddy J. A. (1976). The Maunder Minimum: The reign of Louis XIV appears to have been a time of real anomaly in the behavior of the Sun. Science, 192(4245), 1189-1202.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.192.4245.1189
37. Efimenko V. M., Lozitsky V. G. (2023). Solar cycle 25 amplitude prediction based on sunspot number increase rate. Adv. Space Res., 72(4), 1448-1453.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.006
38. Forgács-Dajka E., Dobos L., Ballai I. (2021). Time-dependent properties of sunspot groups - I. Lifetime and asymmetric evolution. Astron. and Astrophys., 653, A50.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140731
39. Gleissberg W. (1971). The probable behaviour of sunspot cycle 21. Solar Phys., 21, 240-245.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155794
40. Gopalswamy N., M@kel@ P., Yashiro S., Akiyama S. (2018). Long-term solar activity studies using microwave imaging observations and prediction for cycle 25. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 176, 26-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.04.005
41. Gopinath S., Prince P. R. (2018). Prediction of future evolution of solar cycle 24 using machine learning techniques. Proc. Int. Astron. Union, 13(S340), 317-318.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921318001485
42. Gray L. J., Beer J., Geller M., Haigh J. D., Lockwood M., Matthes K., ..., White W. (2010). Solar influences on climate Rev. Geophys., 48(4).
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000282
43. Guo W., Jiang J., Wang J. X. (2021). A dynamo-based prediction of solar cycle 25. Solar Phys., 296, 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01878-2
44. Haigh J. D. (2007). The Sun and the Earth's Climate. Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 4, 2. DOI: 10.12942/lrsp-2007-2.
https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2007-2
45. Hale G. E. (1908). On the probable existence of a magnetic field in Sun-spots. Contributions from the Mount Wilson Observatory/ Carnegie Institution of Washington, No. 30, 1-29.
https://doi.org/10.1086/141602
46. Halevi G., Moed H., Bar-Ilan J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation - Review of the literature. J. Informetrics, 11(3), 823-834.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.005
47. Han M., Wang Y. (2009). Analysis and modeling of multivariate chaotic time series based on neural network. Expert Systemswith Applications, 36(2), 1280-1290.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.057
48. Han M., Xi J., Xu S., Yin F. L. (2004). Prediction of chaotic time series based on the recurrent predictor neural network. IEEE Trans. on signal processing, 52(12), 3409-3416.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2004.837418
49. Han Y. B., Yin Z. Q. (2019). A decline phase modeling for the prediction of solar cycle 25. Solar Phys., 294, 107.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1494-7
50. Hathaway D. H. (2015). The solar cycle. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 12, 1.
https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-4
51. Hathaway D. H., Wilson R. M. (2004). What the sunspot record tells us about space climate. Solar Phys., 224(1-2), 5-19.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-005-3996-8
52. Hathaway D. H., Wilson R. M., Reichmann E. J. (1994). The shape of the sunspot cycle. Solar Phys., 151, 177-190.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654090
53. Hawkes G., Berger M. A. (2018). Magnetic helicity as a predictor of the solar cycle. Solar Phys., 293, 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1332-3
54. Hayakawa H., Ribeiro P., Vaquero J. M., Gallego M. C., Knipp D. J., Mekhaldi F., ..., Ebihara Y. (2020). The extreme space weather event in 1903 October/November: An outburst from the quiet Sun. Astrophys. J. Lett., 897(1), L 10.
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab6a18
55. Hazra G., Choudhuri A. R. (2019). A new formula for predicting solar cycles. Astrophys. J., 880(2), 113.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2718
56. Helal H. R., Galal A. A. (2013). An early prediction of the maximum amplitude of the solar cycle 25. J. Adv. Res., 4(3), 275-278.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.10.002
57. Hiremath K. M. (2008). Prediction of solar cycle 24 and beyond. Astrophys. and Space Sci., 314, 45-49.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-007-9728-9
58. Howard T. (2014). Space weather and coronal mass ejections. Springer, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7975-8
59. Iijima H., Hotta H., Imada S., Kusano K., Shiota D. (2017). Improvement of solar-cycle prediction: plateau of solar axial dipole moment. Astron. and Astrophys., 607, L2.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731813
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654090
53. Hawkes G., Berger M. A. (2018). Magnetic helicity as a predictor of the solar cycle. Solar Phys., 293, 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1332-3
54. Hayakawa H., Ribeiro P., Vaquero J. M., Gallego M. C., Knipp D. J., Mekhaldi F., ..., Ebihara Y. (2020). The extreme space weather event in 1903 October/November: An outburst from the quiet Sun. Astrophys. J. Lett., 897(1), L 10.
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab6a18
55. Hazra G., Choudhuri A. R. (2019). A new formula for predicting solar cycles. Astrophys. J., 880(2), 113.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2718
56. Helal H. R., Galal A. A. (2013). An early prediction of the maximum amplitude of the solar cycle 25. J. Adv. Res., 4(3), 275-278.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.10.002
57. Hiremath K. M. (2008). Prediction of solar cycle 24 and beyond. Astrophys. and Space Sci., 314, 45-49.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-007-9728-9
58. Howard T. (2014). Space weather and coronal mass ejections. Springer, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7975-8
59. Iijima H., Hotta H., Imada S., Kusano K., Shiota D. (2017). Improvement of solar-cycle prediction: plateau of solar axial dipole moment. Astron. and Astrophys., 607, L2.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731813
60. Ineson S., Scaife A. A., Knight J. R., Manners J. C., Dunstone N. J., Gray L. J., Haigh J. D. (2011). Solar forcing of winter climate variability in the Northern Hemisphere. Nature Geosci., 4(11), 753-757.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1282
61. Janssens J. (2021). Prediction of the amplitude of solar cycle 25 using polar faculae observations. J. Space Weather and SpaceClimate, 11, 3.
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020081
62. Javaraiah J. (2015). Long-term variations in the north-south asymmetry of solar activity and solar cycle prediction. III: Prediction for the amplitude of solar cycle 25. New Astronomy, 34, 54-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2014.04.001
63. Javaraiah J. (2023). Prediction for the amplitude and second maximum of Solar Cycle 25 and a comparison of the predictions based on strength of polar magnetic field and low-latitude sunspot area. Mon. Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc., 520(4),5586-5599.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad479
64. Jayalekshmi G. L., Pant T. K., Prince P. R. (2022). Sunspot-Cycle Evolution of Major Periodicities of Solar Activity. Solar Phys., 297(7), 85.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02017-1
65. Jiang J., Wang J. X., Jiao Q. R., Cao J. B. (2018). Predictability of the solar cycle over one cycle. Astrophys. J., 863(2), 159.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad197
66. Kahler S. W. (1992). Solar flares and coronal mass ejections. Annu. Rev. Astron. and Astrophys., 30(1), 113.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.000553
67. Kakad B., Kakad A. (2021). Forecasting peak smooth sunspot number of solar cycle 25: A method based on even-odd pair of solar cycle. Planet. and Space Sci., 209, 105359.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2021.105359
68. Kakad B., Kumar R., Kakad A. (2020). Randomness in sunspot number: A clue to predict solar cycle 25. Solar Phys., 295(6), 88.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01655-7
https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1282
61. Janssens J. (2021). Prediction of the amplitude of solar cycle 25 using polar faculae observations. J. Space Weather and SpaceClimate, 11, 3.
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020081
62. Javaraiah J. (2015). Long-term variations in the north-south asymmetry of solar activity and solar cycle prediction. III: Prediction for the amplitude of solar cycle 25. New Astronomy, 34, 54-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2014.04.001
63. Javaraiah J. (2023). Prediction for the amplitude and second maximum of Solar Cycle 25 and a comparison of the predictions based on strength of polar magnetic field and low-latitude sunspot area. Mon. Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc., 520(4),5586-5599.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad479
64. Jayalekshmi G. L., Pant T. K., Prince P. R. (2022). Sunspot-Cycle Evolution of Major Periodicities of Solar Activity. Solar Phys., 297(7), 85.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02017-1
65. Jiang J., Wang J. X., Jiao Q. R., Cao J. B. (2018). Predictability of the solar cycle over one cycle. Astrophys. J., 863(2), 159.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad197
66. Kahler S. W. (1992). Solar flares and coronal mass ejections. Annu. Rev. Astron. and Astrophys., 30(1), 113.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.000553
67. Kakad B., Kakad A. (2021). Forecasting peak smooth sunspot number of solar cycle 25: A method based on even-odd pair of solar cycle. Planet. and Space Sci., 209, 105359.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2021.105359
68. Kakad B., Kumar R., Kakad A. (2020). Randomness in sunspot number: A clue to predict solar cycle 25. Solar Phys., 295(6), 88.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01655-7
69. Kane R. P. (1992). Did predictions of the maximum sunspot number for solar cycle No. 22 come true? Solar Phys., 140, 171-180.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148437
70. Kane R. P. (1999). Prediction of the sunspot maximum of solar cycle 23 by extrapolation of spectral components. Solar
Phys., 189(1), 217-224.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005298313886
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148437
70. Kane R. P. (1999). Prediction of the sunspot maximum of solar cycle 23 by extrapolation of spectral components. Solar
Phys., 189(1), 217-224.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005298313886
71. Kane R. P. (2001). Did predictions of the maximum sunspot number for solar cycle 23 come true? Solar Phys., 202, 395-406.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012211803591
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012211803591
72. Kane R. P. (2007). Solar cycle predictions based on solar activity at different solar latitudes. Solar Phys., 246, 471-485.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9050-2
73. Kane R. P. (2007b), Solar cycle predictions based on extrapolation of spectral components: An update. Solar Phys., 246, 487-493.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9059-6
74. Kessler M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Amer. document., 14(1), 10-25.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
75. Kh omenko E., Collados M. (2015). Oscillations and Waves in Sunspots. Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 12, 6.
https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-6
76. Kitiashvili I. N. (2020). Application of synoptic magnetograms to global solar activity forecast. Astrophys. J., 890(1), 36.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab64e7
77. Knipp D. J., Ramsay A. C., Beard E. D., Boright A. L., Cade W. B., Hewins I. M., ..., Smart D. F. (2016). The May 1967 great storm and radio disruption event: Extreme space weather and extraordinary responses. Space Weather, 14(9), 614-633.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001423
78. Kopp G. (2021). Science Highlights and Final Updates from 17 Years of Total Solar Irradiance Measurements from the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment/Total Irradiance Monitor (SORCE/TIM). Solar Phys., 296, 133.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01853-x
79. Kosovichev A. G. (1996). Tomographic imaging of the Sun's interior. Astrophys. J., 461(1), L55.
https://doi.org/10.1086/309989
80. Kosovichev A. G., Schou J., Scherrer P., Bogart R., Bush R., Hoeksema J., Aloise J., ..., Milford P. (1997). Structure and Rotation of the Solar Interior: Initial Results from the MDI Medium-L Program. The First Results from SOHO. Eds Fleck B., kkestka Z. Springer, Dordrecht.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5236-5_3
81. Krausmann E., Andersson E., Gibbs M., Murtagh W. (2016). Space weather & critical infrastructures: findings and outlook.Publ. Office Eur. Union. EUR 28237 EN.
https://doi.org/10.1086/30998910.2788/152877
82. Kumar P., Biswas A., Karak B. B. (2022). Physical link of the polar field buildup with the Waldmeier effect broadens the scope of early solar cycle prediction: Cycle 25 is likely to be slightly stronger than Cycle 24. Mon. Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc. Lett., 513(1), L112-L116.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slac043
83. Kumar P., Nagy M., Lemerle A., Karak B. B., Petrovay K. (2021). The polar precursor method for solar cycle prediction: Comparison of predictors and their temporal range. Astrophys. J., 909(1), 87.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abdbb4
84. Labonville F., Charbonneau P., Lemerle A. (2019). A dynamo-based forecast of solar cycle 25. Solar Phys., 294, 82.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1480-0
85. Leung F. H. F., Lam H. K., Ling S. H., Tam P. K. S. (2003). Tuning of the structure and parameters of a neural network using an improved genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 14(1), 79-88.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2002.804317
86. Leydesdorff L., Bornmann L. (2012). Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. and Technol., 63(7), 1442-1458.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22666
87. Li F. Y., Kong D. F., Xie J. L., Xiang N. B., Xu J. C. (2018). Solar cycle characteristics and their application in the prediction of cycle 25. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 181, 110-115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.10.014
88. Li K. J., Feng W., Li F. Y. (2015). Predicting the maximum amplitude of solar cycle 25 and its timing. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 135, 72-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.09.010
89. Li K. J., Shi X. J., Xie J. L., Gao P. X., Liang H. F., Zhan L. S., Feng W. (2013). Solar-cycle-related variation of solar differential rotation. Mon. Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc., 433, 521.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt744
90. Lu J. Y., Xiong Y. T., Zhao K., Wang M., Li J. Y., Peng G. S., Sun M. (2022). A novel bimodal forecasting model for solar cycle 25. Astrophys. J., 924(2), 59.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac3488
91. McIntosh P. S. (1990). The classification of sunspot groups. Solar Phys., 125, 251-267.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158405
92. McIntosh S. W., Chapman S., Leamon R. J., Egeland R., Watkins N. W. (2020). Overlapping Magnetic Activity Cycles and the Sunspot Number: Forecasting Sunspot Cycle 25 Amplitude. Solar Phys., 295, 163.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01723-y
93. McIntosh S. W., Leamon R. J., Egeland R. (2023). Deciphering solar magnetic activity: The (solar) hale cycle terminator of 2021. Front. Astron. and Space Sci., 10, 1050523.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1050523
94. Mongeon P., Paul-Hus A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
95. Moustafa S. S., Khodairy S. S. (2023). Comparison of different predictive models and their effectiveness in sunspot number prediction. Phys. Scripta, 98(4), 045022.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/acc21a
96. Muñoz-Jaramillo A., Vaquero J. M. (2019). Visualization of the challenges and limitations of the long-term sunspot number record. Nature Astron., 3(3), 205. https://
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0638-2
97. Mursula K., Zieger B., Vilppola J. H. (2003). Mid-term quasi-periodicities in geomagnetic activity during the last 15 solar cycles: Connection to solar dynamo strength - To the memory of Karolen I. Paularena (1957-2001). Solar Phys., 212, 201.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022980029618
98. Nagovitsyn Y. A., Ivanov V. G. (2023). Solar Cycle Pairing and Prediction of Cycle 25. Solar Phys., 298(3), 37.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-023-02121-w
99. Nandy D. (2021). Progress in Solar Cycle Predictions: Sunspot Cycles 24-25 in Perspective. Solar Phys., 296, 54.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01797-2
100. Okoh D. I., Seemala G. K., Rabiu A. B., Uwamahoro J., Habarulema J. B., Aggarwal M. (2018). A Hybrid Regression‐ Neural Network (HR‐NN) method for forecasting the solar activity. Space Weather, 16(9), 1424-1436.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001907
101. Orduña Malea E., Martín-Martín A., Delgado-López-Cózar E. (2017). Google Scholar as a source for scholarly evaluation: a bibliographic review of database errors. Rev. española de documentación científica, 40(4), 1-33.
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.4.1500
102. Overbye D. (2021). Will the Next Space-Weather Season Be Stormy or Fair? The New York Times, New York. UEL:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/28/science/astronomy-sun-space-weather.html
103. Owens M. J., Barnard L.A., Muscheler R., Herbst K., Lockwood M., Usoskin I., Asvestari E. (2024). A Geomagnetic Estimate of Heliospheric Modulation Potential over the Last 175 Years. Solar Phys., 299, 84.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-024-02316-9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9050-2
73. Kane R. P. (2007b), Solar cycle predictions based on extrapolation of spectral components: An update. Solar Phys., 246, 487-493.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9059-6
74. Kessler M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Amer. document., 14(1), 10-25.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
75. Kh omenko E., Collados M. (2015). Oscillations and Waves in Sunspots. Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 12, 6.
https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-6
76. Kitiashvili I. N. (2020). Application of synoptic magnetograms to global solar activity forecast. Astrophys. J., 890(1), 36.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab64e7
77. Knipp D. J., Ramsay A. C., Beard E. D., Boright A. L., Cade W. B., Hewins I. M., ..., Smart D. F. (2016). The May 1967 great storm and radio disruption event: Extreme space weather and extraordinary responses. Space Weather, 14(9), 614-633.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001423
78. Kopp G. (2021). Science Highlights and Final Updates from 17 Years of Total Solar Irradiance Measurements from the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment/Total Irradiance Monitor (SORCE/TIM). Solar Phys., 296, 133.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01853-x
79. Kosovichev A. G. (1996). Tomographic imaging of the Sun's interior. Astrophys. J., 461(1), L55.
https://doi.org/10.1086/309989
80. Kosovichev A. G., Schou J., Scherrer P., Bogart R., Bush R., Hoeksema J., Aloise J., ..., Milford P. (1997). Structure and Rotation of the Solar Interior: Initial Results from the MDI Medium-L Program. The First Results from SOHO. Eds Fleck B., kkestka Z. Springer, Dordrecht.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5236-5_3
81. Krausmann E., Andersson E., Gibbs M., Murtagh W. (2016). Space weather & critical infrastructures: findings and outlook.Publ. Office Eur. Union. EUR 28237 EN.
https://doi.org/10.1086/30998910.2788/152877
82. Kumar P., Biswas A., Karak B. B. (2022). Physical link of the polar field buildup with the Waldmeier effect broadens the scope of early solar cycle prediction: Cycle 25 is likely to be slightly stronger than Cycle 24. Mon. Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc. Lett., 513(1), L112-L116.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slac043
83. Kumar P., Nagy M., Lemerle A., Karak B. B., Petrovay K. (2021). The polar precursor method for solar cycle prediction: Comparison of predictors and their temporal range. Astrophys. J., 909(1), 87.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abdbb4
84. Labonville F., Charbonneau P., Lemerle A. (2019). A dynamo-based forecast of solar cycle 25. Solar Phys., 294, 82.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1480-0
85. Leung F. H. F., Lam H. K., Ling S. H., Tam P. K. S. (2003). Tuning of the structure and parameters of a neural network using an improved genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 14(1), 79-88.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2002.804317
86. Leydesdorff L., Bornmann L. (2012). Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. and Technol., 63(7), 1442-1458.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22666
87. Li F. Y., Kong D. F., Xie J. L., Xiang N. B., Xu J. C. (2018). Solar cycle characteristics and their application in the prediction of cycle 25. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 181, 110-115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.10.014
88. Li K. J., Feng W., Li F. Y. (2015). Predicting the maximum amplitude of solar cycle 25 and its timing. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 135, 72-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.09.010
89. Li K. J., Shi X. J., Xie J. L., Gao P. X., Liang H. F., Zhan L. S., Feng W. (2013). Solar-cycle-related variation of solar differential rotation. Mon. Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc., 433, 521.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt744
90. Lu J. Y., Xiong Y. T., Zhao K., Wang M., Li J. Y., Peng G. S., Sun M. (2022). A novel bimodal forecasting model for solar cycle 25. Astrophys. J., 924(2), 59.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac3488
91. McIntosh P. S. (1990). The classification of sunspot groups. Solar Phys., 125, 251-267.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158405
92. McIntosh S. W., Chapman S., Leamon R. J., Egeland R., Watkins N. W. (2020). Overlapping Magnetic Activity Cycles and the Sunspot Number: Forecasting Sunspot Cycle 25 Amplitude. Solar Phys., 295, 163.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01723-y
93. McIntosh S. W., Leamon R. J., Egeland R. (2023). Deciphering solar magnetic activity: The (solar) hale cycle terminator of 2021. Front. Astron. and Space Sci., 10, 1050523.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1050523
94. Mongeon P., Paul-Hus A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
95. Moustafa S. S., Khodairy S. S. (2023). Comparison of different predictive models and their effectiveness in sunspot number prediction. Phys. Scripta, 98(4), 045022.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/acc21a
96. Muñoz-Jaramillo A., Vaquero J. M. (2019). Visualization of the challenges and limitations of the long-term sunspot number record. Nature Astron., 3(3), 205. https://
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0638-2
97. Mursula K., Zieger B., Vilppola J. H. (2003). Mid-term quasi-periodicities in geomagnetic activity during the last 15 solar cycles: Connection to solar dynamo strength - To the memory of Karolen I. Paularena (1957-2001). Solar Phys., 212, 201.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022980029618
98. Nagovitsyn Y. A., Ivanov V. G. (2023). Solar Cycle Pairing and Prediction of Cycle 25. Solar Phys., 298(3), 37.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-023-02121-w
99. Nandy D. (2021). Progress in Solar Cycle Predictions: Sunspot Cycles 24-25 in Perspective. Solar Phys., 296, 54.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01797-2
100. Okoh D. I., Seemala G. K., Rabiu A. B., Uwamahoro J., Habarulema J. B., Aggarwal M. (2018). A Hybrid Regression‐ Neural Network (HR‐NN) method for forecasting the solar activity. Space Weather, 16(9), 1424-1436.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001907
101. Orduña Malea E., Martín-Martín A., Delgado-López-Cózar E. (2017). Google Scholar as a source for scholarly evaluation: a bibliographic review of database errors. Rev. española de documentación científica, 40(4), 1-33.
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.4.1500
102. Overbye D. (2021). Will the Next Space-Weather Season Be Stormy or Fair? The New York Times, New York. UEL:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/28/science/astronomy-sun-space-weather.html
103. Owens M. J., Barnard L.A., Muscheler R., Herbst K., Lockwood M., Usoskin I., Asvestari E. (2024). A Geomagnetic Estimate of Heliospheric Modulation Potential over the Last 175 Years. Solar Phys., 299, 84.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-024-02316-9
104. Pala Z., Atici R. (2019). Forecasting sunspot time series using deep learning methods. Solar Phys., 294(5), 50.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1434-6
105. Parker E. N. (1979). Sunspots and the physics of magnetic flux tubes. IX-Umbral dots and longitudinal overstability. Astrophys. J., Part 1, 234, 333-347.
https://doi.org/10.1086/157501
106. Peguero J. C., Carrasco V. M. S. (2023). A Critical Comment on "Can Solar Cycle 25 Be a New Dalton Minimum? Solar Phys., 298, 48.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-023-02140-7
107. Pesnell W. D. (2020). Lessons learned from predictions of Solar Cycle 24. J. Space Weather and Space Climate, 10, 60.
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020060
108. Pesnell W. D., Schatten K. H. (2018). An early prediction of the amplitude of solar cycle 25. Solar Phys., 293(7), 112.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1330-5
109. Petrovay K. (2020). Solar cycle prediction. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 17(1), 2.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-020-0022-z
110. Petrovay K., Nagy M., Gerják T., Juhász L. (2018). Precursors of an upcoming solar cycle at high latitudes from coronal green line data. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 176, 15-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.12.011
111. Pishkalo M. I. (2008). Preliminary prediction of solar cycles 24 and 25 based on the correlation between cycle parameters. Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, 24(5), 242-247.
https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591308050036
112. Podladchikova T., Jain S., Veronig A. M., Sutyrina O., Dumbović M., Clette F., Pötzi W. (2022). Maximal growth rate of the ascending phase of a sunspot cycle for predicting its amplitude. Astron. and Astrophys., 663, A88.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243509
113. Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Podsakoff N. P., Bachrach D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. J. Management, 34(4), 641-720.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308319533
114. Prasad A., Roy S., Sarkar A., Panja S. C., Patra S. N. (2023). An Improved Prediction of Solar Cycle 25 Using Deep Learning Based Neural Network. Solar Phys., 298(3), 50.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-023-02129-2
115. Pulkkinen T. (2007). Space Weather: Terrestrial Perspective. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 4, 1.
https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2007-1
116. Quassim M. S., Attia A. F., Elminir H. K. (2007). Forecasting the peak amplitude of the 24th and 25th sunspot cycles and accompanying geomagnetic activity. Solar Phys., 243, 253-258.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-0447-8
117. Rigozo N. R., Echer M. S., Evangelista H., Nordemann D. J. R., Echer E. (2011). Prediction of sunspot number amplitude and solar cycle length for cycles 24 and 25. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 73(11-12), 1294-1299.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.09.005
118. Sarp V., Kilcik A., Yurchyshyn V., Rozelot J. P., Ozguc A. (2018). Prediction of solar cycle 25: a non-linear approach. Mon.Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc., 481(3), 2981-2985. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2470
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2470
119. Schrijver C. J. (2015). Socio-economic hazards and impacts of space weather: The important range between mild and
extreme. Space Weather, 13(9), 524-528.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015SW001252
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1434-6
105. Parker E. N. (1979). Sunspots and the physics of magnetic flux tubes. IX-Umbral dots and longitudinal overstability. Astrophys. J., Part 1, 234, 333-347.
https://doi.org/10.1086/157501
106. Peguero J. C., Carrasco V. M. S. (2023). A Critical Comment on "Can Solar Cycle 25 Be a New Dalton Minimum? Solar Phys., 298, 48.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-023-02140-7
107. Pesnell W. D. (2020). Lessons learned from predictions of Solar Cycle 24. J. Space Weather and Space Climate, 10, 60.
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020060
108. Pesnell W. D., Schatten K. H. (2018). An early prediction of the amplitude of solar cycle 25. Solar Phys., 293(7), 112.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1330-5
109. Petrovay K. (2020). Solar cycle prediction. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 17(1), 2.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-020-0022-z
110. Petrovay K., Nagy M., Gerják T., Juhász L. (2018). Precursors of an upcoming solar cycle at high latitudes from coronal green line data. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 176, 15-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.12.011
111. Pishkalo M. I. (2008). Preliminary prediction of solar cycles 24 and 25 based on the correlation between cycle parameters. Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, 24(5), 242-247.
https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591308050036
112. Podladchikova T., Jain S., Veronig A. M., Sutyrina O., Dumbović M., Clette F., Pötzi W. (2022). Maximal growth rate of the ascending phase of a sunspot cycle for predicting its amplitude. Astron. and Astrophys., 663, A88.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243509
113. Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Podsakoff N. P., Bachrach D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. J. Management, 34(4), 641-720.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308319533
114. Prasad A., Roy S., Sarkar A., Panja S. C., Patra S. N. (2023). An Improved Prediction of Solar Cycle 25 Using Deep Learning Based Neural Network. Solar Phys., 298(3), 50.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-023-02129-2
115. Pulkkinen T. (2007). Space Weather: Terrestrial Perspective. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 4, 1.
https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2007-1
116. Quassim M. S., Attia A. F., Elminir H. K. (2007). Forecasting the peak amplitude of the 24th and 25th sunspot cycles and accompanying geomagnetic activity. Solar Phys., 243, 253-258.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-0447-8
117. Rigozo N. R., Echer M. S., Evangelista H., Nordemann D. J. R., Echer E. (2011). Prediction of sunspot number amplitude and solar cycle length for cycles 24 and 25. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 73(11-12), 1294-1299.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.09.005
118. Sarp V., Kilcik A., Yurchyshyn V., Rozelot J. P., Ozguc A. (2018). Prediction of solar cycle 25: a non-linear approach. Mon.Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc., 481(3), 2981-2985. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2470
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2470
119. Schrijver C. J. (2015). Socio-economic hazards and impacts of space weather: The important range between mild and
extreme. Space Weather, 13(9), 524-528.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015SW001252
120. Schrijver C. J., Kauristie K., Aylward A. D., Denardini C. M., Gibson S. E., Glover A., ... Vilmer N. (2015). Understanding space weather to shield society: A global road map for 2015-2025 commissioned by COSPAR and ILWS. Adv. Space Res.,55(12), 2745.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.03.023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.03.023.
121. Schwenn R. (2006). Space weather: The solar perspective. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 3(1), 1.
https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2006-2
122. Sello S. (2019). Solar cycle activity: An early prediction for cycle #25. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.05294.
123. Shi Z., Han M. (2007). Support vector echo-state machine for chaotic time-series prediction. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks,18(2), 359-372.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2006.885113
124. Singh A. K., Bhargawa A. (2017). An early prediction of 25th solar cycle using Hurst exponent. Astrophys. and Space Sci., 362(11), 199.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3180-2
125. Singh P. R., Saad Farid A. I., Singh A. K., Pant T. K., Aly A. A. (2021). Predicting the maximum sunspot number and the associated geomagnetic activity indices aa and Ap for solar cycle 25. Astrophys. and Space Sci., 366(5), 48.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-03953-3
126. Small H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci., 24(4), 265-269.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
127. Solanki S. K. (2003), Sunspots: an overview. Astron. and Astrophys. Rev., 11, 153-286.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-003-0018-4
128. Solanki S. K., Krivova N. A. (2003). Can solar variability explain global warming since 1970? J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys 108(A5).
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009753
129. Solanki S. K., Usoskin I. G., Kromer B., Schüssler M., Beer J. (2004). Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years. Nature, 431(7012), 1084.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02995
130. Song M., Ding Y. (2014). Topic modeling: Measuring scholarly impact using a topical lens. Measuring Scholarly Impact. Springer, Cham, 235-257.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_11
131. Su X., Liang B., Feng S., Dai W., Yang Y. (2023). Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Using N-BEATS. Astrophys. J., 947(2), 50.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc799
132. Svalgaard L., Cliver E. W., Kamide Y. (2005). Sunspot cycle 24: Smallest cycle in 100 years? Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(1).
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021664
133. Temmer M. (2021). Space weather: the solar perspective: An update to Schwenn (2006). Living Rev. Solar Phys., 18(1), 4.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-021-00030-3
134. Thongpapanl N. T. (2012). The changing landscape of technology and innovation management: An updated ranking of journals in the field. Technovation, 32(5), 257-271.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.01.001
135. Tobiska W. K., Bouwer S. D., Bowman B. R. (2008). The development of new solar indices for use in thermospheric density modeling. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 70(5), 803-819.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2007.11.001
136. Traag V. A., Waltman L., Van Eck N. J. (2019). From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci. Reports, 9(1), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z
137. Tsai J. T., Chou J. H., Liu T. K. (2006). Tuning the structure and parameters of a neural network by using hybrid Taguchigenetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 17(1), 69-80.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2005.860885
138. Upton L. A., Hathaway D. H. (2018). An updated solar cycle 25 prediction with AFT: The modern minimum. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45(16), 8091-8095.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078387
139. Usoskin I. G. (2023). A history of solar activity over millennia. Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 20, 2.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-023-00036-z
140. Usoskin I. G., Mursula K., Solanki S. K., Schüssler M., Kovaltsov G. A. (2002). A physical reconstruction of cosmic ray intensity since 1610. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 107(A11), SSH-13.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009343
141. Usoskin I. G., Solanki S. K., Krivova N. A., Hofer B., Kovaltsov G. A., Wacker L., ..., Kromer B. (2021). Solar cyclic activity over the last millennium reconstructed from annual 14C data. Astron. and Astrophys., 649, A141.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140711
142. Valderrama-Zurián J. C., Aguilar-Moya R., Melero-Fuentes D., Aleixandre-Benavent R. (2015). A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus. J. Inform., 9(3), 570-576.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002
143. Van Eck N. J., Waltman L. (2007). VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. Advances in data analysis.Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 299-306. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70981-7_34
144. Van Eck N. J., Waltman L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics,84(2), 523-538.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
145. Van Eck N., Waltman L., Noyons E., Buter R. (2010). Automatic term identification for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 82(3), 581-596.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0173-0
146. Van Eck N. J., Waltman L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. Measuring scholarly impact. Springer, Cham, 285-320.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
147. Vaquero J. M., Svalgaard L., Carrasco V. M. S., Clette F., Lefèvre L., Gallego M. C., Arlt R., Aparicio A. J. P., Richard J.-G.,Howe R. (2016). A revised collection of sunspot group numbers. Solar Phys., 291, 3061.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0982-2
148. Versteegh G. J. (2005). Solar forcing of climate. 2: Evidence from the past. Space Sci. Rev., 120, 243.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-005-7047-4
149. Visser M., Van Eck N. J., Waltman L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science,
Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quant. Sci. Studies, 2(1), 20-41.
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112
https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2006-2
122. Sello S. (2019). Solar cycle activity: An early prediction for cycle #25. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.05294.
123. Shi Z., Han M. (2007). Support vector echo-state machine for chaotic time-series prediction. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks,18(2), 359-372.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2006.885113
124. Singh A. K., Bhargawa A. (2017). An early prediction of 25th solar cycle using Hurst exponent. Astrophys. and Space Sci., 362(11), 199.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3180-2
125. Singh P. R., Saad Farid A. I., Singh A. K., Pant T. K., Aly A. A. (2021). Predicting the maximum sunspot number and the associated geomagnetic activity indices aa and Ap for solar cycle 25. Astrophys. and Space Sci., 366(5), 48.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-03953-3
126. Small H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci., 24(4), 265-269.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
127. Solanki S. K. (2003), Sunspots: an overview. Astron. and Astrophys. Rev., 11, 153-286.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-003-0018-4
128. Solanki S. K., Krivova N. A. (2003). Can solar variability explain global warming since 1970? J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys 108(A5).
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009753
129. Solanki S. K., Usoskin I. G., Kromer B., Schüssler M., Beer J. (2004). Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years. Nature, 431(7012), 1084.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02995
130. Song M., Ding Y. (2014). Topic modeling: Measuring scholarly impact using a topical lens. Measuring Scholarly Impact. Springer, Cham, 235-257.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_11
131. Su X., Liang B., Feng S., Dai W., Yang Y. (2023). Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Using N-BEATS. Astrophys. J., 947(2), 50.
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc799
132. Svalgaard L., Cliver E. W., Kamide Y. (2005). Sunspot cycle 24: Smallest cycle in 100 years? Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(1).
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021664
133. Temmer M. (2021). Space weather: the solar perspective: An update to Schwenn (2006). Living Rev. Solar Phys., 18(1), 4.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-021-00030-3
134. Thongpapanl N. T. (2012). The changing landscape of technology and innovation management: An updated ranking of journals in the field. Technovation, 32(5), 257-271.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.01.001
135. Tobiska W. K., Bouwer S. D., Bowman B. R. (2008). The development of new solar indices for use in thermospheric density modeling. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 70(5), 803-819.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2007.11.001
136. Traag V. A., Waltman L., Van Eck N. J. (2019). From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci. Reports, 9(1), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z
137. Tsai J. T., Chou J. H., Liu T. K. (2006). Tuning the structure and parameters of a neural network by using hybrid Taguchigenetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 17(1), 69-80.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2005.860885
138. Upton L. A., Hathaway D. H. (2018). An updated solar cycle 25 prediction with AFT: The modern minimum. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45(16), 8091-8095.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078387
139. Usoskin I. G. (2023). A history of solar activity over millennia. Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 20, 2.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-023-00036-z
140. Usoskin I. G., Mursula K., Solanki S. K., Schüssler M., Kovaltsov G. A. (2002). A physical reconstruction of cosmic ray intensity since 1610. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 107(A11), SSH-13.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009343
141. Usoskin I. G., Solanki S. K., Krivova N. A., Hofer B., Kovaltsov G. A., Wacker L., ..., Kromer B. (2021). Solar cyclic activity over the last millennium reconstructed from annual 14C data. Astron. and Astrophys., 649, A141.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140711
142. Valderrama-Zurián J. C., Aguilar-Moya R., Melero-Fuentes D., Aleixandre-Benavent R. (2015). A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus. J. Inform., 9(3), 570-576.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002
143. Van Eck N. J., Waltman L. (2007). VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. Advances in data analysis.Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 299-306. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70981-7_34
144. Van Eck N. J., Waltman L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics,84(2), 523-538.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
145. Van Eck N., Waltman L., Noyons E., Buter R. (2010). Automatic term identification for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 82(3), 581-596.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0173-0
146. Van Eck N. J., Waltman L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. Measuring scholarly impact. Springer, Cham, 285-320.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
147. Vaquero J. M., Svalgaard L., Carrasco V. M. S., Clette F., Lefèvre L., Gallego M. C., Arlt R., Aparicio A. J. P., Richard J.-G.,Howe R. (2016). A revised collection of sunspot group numbers. Solar Phys., 291, 3061.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0982-2
148. Versteegh G. J. (2005). Solar forcing of climate. 2: Evidence from the past. Space Sci. Rev., 120, 243.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-005-7047-4
149. Visser M., Van Eck N. J., Waltman L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science,
Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quant. Sci. Studies, 2(1), 20-41.
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112
150. WorldBank. World Bank Group. Country Income Classifications (Internet).
URL: http://www.worldbank.org/ (Last accessed:15 Jun 2024).
151. WorldBank. World Bank Group. Gross Domestic Product 2024 (Internet).
URL: http://www.worldbank.org/ (Last accessed:15 Jun 2024).
152. Wouters P., Thelwall M., Kousha K.,Waltman L., de Rijcke S., Rushforth A., Wouters P. (2015). The Metric Tide:Literature Review, Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. HEFCE: London, UK.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5066.3520
153. Xiong Y., Lu J., Zhao K., Sun M., Gao Y. (2021). Forecasting solar cycle 25 using comprehensive precursor combination and multiple regression technique. Mon. Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc., 505(1), 1046-1052.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1159
154. Yan E., Ding Y., Jacob E. K. (2012). Overlaying communities and topics: An analysis on publication networks. Scientometrics, 90(2), 499-513.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0531-6
155. Zhu H., Zhu W., He M. (2022). Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Using an Optimized Long Short-Term Memory Model with F10.7. Solar Phys., 297(12), 157.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02091-5
156. Zhu J., Liu W. (2020) A Tale of Two Databases: The Use of Web of Science and Scopus in Academic Papers. Scientometrics,123, 321-335.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
URL: http://www.worldbank.org/ (Last accessed:15 Jun 2024).
151. WorldBank. World Bank Group. Gross Domestic Product 2024 (Internet).
URL: http://www.worldbank.org/ (Last accessed:15 Jun 2024).
152. Wouters P., Thelwall M., Kousha K.,Waltman L., de Rijcke S., Rushforth A., Wouters P. (2015). The Metric Tide:Literature Review, Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. HEFCE: London, UK.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5066.3520
153. Xiong Y., Lu J., Zhao K., Sun M., Gao Y. (2021). Forecasting solar cycle 25 using comprehensive precursor combination and multiple regression technique. Mon. Notic. Roy. Astron. Soc., 505(1), 1046-1052.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1159
154. Yan E., Ding Y., Jacob E. K. (2012). Overlaying communities and topics: An analysis on publication networks. Scientometrics, 90(2), 499-513.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0531-6
155. Zhu H., Zhu W., He M. (2022). Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Using an Optimized Long Short-Term Memory Model with F10.7. Solar Phys., 297(12), 157.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02091-5
156. Zhu J., Liu W. (2020) A Tale of Two Databases: The Use of Web of Science and Scopus in Academic Papers. Scientometrics,123, 321-335.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8