Time variations of ion composition in the topside ionosphere during the 1 august 2008 solar eclipse
Heading:
1Kotov, DV, 2Puliaiev, VA, 3Chernogor, LF 1Institute of Ionosphere of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine 2Institute of Ionosphere of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine 3V.N. Karazin National University of Kharkiv, Kharkiv, Ukraine |
Kosm. nauka tehnol. 2009, 15 ;(5):34-42 |
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2009.05.034 |
Publication Language: Russian |
Abstract: The results of observations of ion composition behaviour in the topside ionosphere during the 1 August 2008 partial (phase is 0.42) solar eclipse are presented. The measurements were carried out using the Kharkiv incoherent scatter radar. It is shown that during the main phase of the solar eclipse, in the 450–650 km altitude range, fractional content of protons increased to 50 % as compared with the control day. The start of fractional content increasing was different at the different altitudes and increasing above 560 km was advancing the solar eclipse start above the observatory. We suggest that this effect can be interpreted by the lunar shadow approaching to the observatory from north.
|
Keywords: ions, solar eclipse, topside ionosphere |
References:
1. Akimov L. A., Bogovskii V. K., Grigorenko E. I., et al. Atmospheric–ionospheric effects of the solar eclipse of May 31, 2003, in Kharkov. Geomagn. Aehron., 45 (4), 526–551 (2005) [in Russian].
2. Akimov L. A., Grigorenko E. I., Taran V. I., et al. Integrated radio physical and optical studies of dynamic processes in the atmosphere and geospace caused by the solar eclipse of August 11, 1999. Zarubezhnaya radioelektronika. Uspekhi sovremennoi radioelektroniki, No. 2, 25–63 (2002) [in Russian].
3. Akimov L. A., Grigorenko E. I., Taran V. I., Chernogor L. F. Features atmosphericionospheric effects of the solar eclipse of May 31, 2003: The results of the optical and radio physical observations in Kharkov. Uspekhi sovremennoi radioelektroniki, No. 3, 55–70 (2005) [in Russian].
4. Brjunelli B. E., Namgaladze A. A. Ionospheric physics, 527 p. (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].
5. Burmaka V. P., Grigorenko E. I., Emel'janov L. Ja., et al. Radar observations Geospace effects caused by the partial solar eclipse of March 29, 2006.Uspehi sovremennoj radiojelektroniki, No.3, 38–53 (2007) [in Russian].
6. Burmaka V. P., Lysenko V. N., Lyashenko M. V., Chernogor L. F. Tropospheric-ionospheric effects of the 3 October 2005 partial solar eclipse in Kharkiv. 1. Observations. Kosm. nauka tehnol., 13 (6), 74–86 (2007) [in Russian].
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2007.06.074
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2007.06.074
7. Burmaka V. P., Chernogor L. F. The wave-like disturbances in the ionosphere during vernal equinox in 2006. Kosm. nauka tehnol., 14 (4), 82–91 (2008) [in Russian].
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2008.04.082
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2008.04.082
8. Grigorenko E. I., Lyashenko M. V., Chernogor L. F. Effects of the solar eclipse of March 29, 2006, in the ionosphere and atmosphere. Geomagn. Aehron., 48 (3), 350–364 (2008) [in Russian].
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208030092
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208030092
9. Grigorenko Ye. I., Paziura S. A., Puliaiev V. A., et al. Dynamic processes in the ionosphere during the geospace storm on 30 May and solar eclipse on 31 May 2003. Kosm. nauka tehnol., 10 (1), 12–25 (2004) [in Russian].
10. Lysenko V. N. Programmable correlator to measure the ionospheric parameters using the incoherent scatter method. Bulletin of the Kharkiv State Polytechnic University, Is. 1, No. 1, 96–99 (1999) [in Russian].
11. Lysenko V. N. Measurement of the ionosphere parameters by means of correlation processing of the incoherent scatter signal. Radiophysics and electronics, 7 (1), 82–88 (2002) [in Russian].
12. Lyashenko M. V., Chernogor L. F. Tropospheric-ionospheric effects of the 3 October 2005 partial Solar eclipse in Kharkiv. 2. Modeling and discussion. Kosm. nauka tehnol., 14 (1), 57–64 (2008) [in Russian].
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2008.01.057
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2008.01.057
13. Rogozhkin E. V. Measuring the ionospheric plasma parameters using the correlation function of incoherent scatter signal. In: Ionospheric studies, N 27, 46–59 (Soviet Radio, Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].
14. Taran V. I. A study of the natural and artificially disturbed ionosphere by the incoherent scatter method. Geomagn. Aehron., 41 (5), 659–666 (2001) [in Russian].
15. Evans J.W. Theoretical and practical issues to investigate the ionosphere by means of incoherent scattering of radio waves. Proceedings of the IEEE, 57 (4), 139–171 (1969) [in Russian].
16. Baron M. J. Incoherent scatter radar observations of the auroral zone ionosphere during the total eclipse of July 10, 1972. J. Geophys. Res., 78 (31), 7451– 7460 (1973).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA078i031p07451
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA078i031p07451
17.Evans J. V. An F region eclipse. J. Geophys. Res., 70 (1), 131–142 (1965).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i001p00131
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i001p00131
18. Evans J. V. On the behavior of f0F2 during solar eclipses. J. Geophys. Res., 70 (3), 733–738 (1965).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i003p00733
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i003p00733
19. MacPherson B., Gonzalez S. A., Silzer M. P., et al. Measurements of the topside ionosphere over Arecibo during total solar eclipse of February 26, 1998. J. Geophys. Res., 105 (A10), 23.055–23.068 (1998).
20. Salah J. E., Oliver W. L., Foster J. C., et al. Observations of the May 30, 1984, annual solar eclipse at Millstone Hill. J. Geophys. Res., 91 (A2), 1651– 1660 (1986).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA091iA02p01651
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA091iA02p01651
21. Sterling D. L., Hanson W. B., Woodman R. F. Synthesis of data obtained at Jicamarca, Peru, during the September 11, 1969, eclipse. Radio Sci., 7 (2), 279–289 (1972).