Design and optimization of a propeller with increased energy efficiency
Heading:
| 1Tabatadze, N, 1Mazanishvili, D, 1Maisuradze, A 1Georgian Aviation University, Tbilisi, Georgia |
| Space Sci. & Technol. 2025, 31 ;(4):22-30 |
| https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2025.04.022 |
| Publication Language: English |
Abstract: In modern electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) multi-rotor aircraft, the propeller serves as the primary unit for flight. Consequently, the majority of the onboard electricity is dedicated to its operation. One of the primary challenges in such machines is the short flight duration, typically ranging from 20 to 30 minutes, directly attributed to the efficient operation of the propellers.
The article discusses the positive effects achieved through geometric changes in the design of modern propellers and their impact on aircraft technical data.
During the research, various conceptual models of propellers were developed, based on the widely used construction in today's electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) flying machines. Both computer simulations and experimental tests were conducted on these models.
After scientific research and analysis, the most promising conceptual propeller model has been identified, demonstrating a 10-15% improvement in energy efficiency compared to traditional propeller designs.
|
| Keywords: propeller; drone; energy efficiency; noise; induced drag |
References:
1. J. P. Sullivan, L. K. Chang, C. J. Miller. SAE Transactions. The Effect of Proplets and Bi-Blades on the Performance and Noise of Propellers (1981)
https://doi.org/10.4271/810600
2. J. H. Xu; W. P. Song; X. D. Yang. ResearchGate article. Effects of Proplet on Propeller Efficiency (2011)
3. Richard T. Whitcomb. (1980) NACA research memorandum. A description of the design of highly swept propeller blades
4. E.L. Houghton; P.W. Carpenter; Steven H. Collicott; Daniel T. Valentine. Aerodynamics for Engineering Students (2015)
5. N. SLOSAR. AVIANS TO AIRPLANES: BIOMIMICRY IN FLIGHT AND WING DESIGN (2021)
https://doi.org/10.5070/BS325254487
6. ოთარ კემულარია, თამაზ ობგაძე. უპილოტო საფრენი აპარატების ავტომატიზებული პროექტირების საფუძვლები (მონოგრაფია) (2022)
7. Завалов О.А. Башаров Е.А. Конструкция лопастей несущих и рулевых винтов (2019)
8. N. Tabatadze. Increasing the efficiency of the propeller through geometric optimization, Ph.D. thesis (2023)
9. N. Tabatadze, S. Bliadze, N. Bliadze, B.Churchelauri. PROPELLER WITH INCREASED ENERGY EFFICIENCY. SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL JOURNAL, "BUILDING" #3(67), (2023)
10. Leishman, J. G. Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. 2nd Edition.
https://doi.org/10.4271/810600
2. J. H. Xu; W. P. Song; X. D. Yang. ResearchGate article. Effects of Proplet on Propeller Efficiency (2011)
3. Richard T. Whitcomb. (1980) NACA research memorandum. A description of the design of highly swept propeller blades
4. E.L. Houghton; P.W. Carpenter; Steven H. Collicott; Daniel T. Valentine. Aerodynamics for Engineering Students (2015)
5. N. SLOSAR. AVIANS TO AIRPLANES: BIOMIMICRY IN FLIGHT AND WING DESIGN (2021)
https://doi.org/10.5070/BS325254487
6. ოთარ კემულარია, თამაზ ობგაძე. უპილოტო საფრენი აპარატების ავტომატიზებული პროექტირების საფუძვლები (მონოგრაფია) (2022)
7. Завалов О.А. Башаров Е.А. Конструкция лопастей несущих и рулевых винтов (2019)
8. N. Tabatadze. Increasing the efficiency of the propeller through geometric optimization, Ph.D. thesis (2023)
9. N. Tabatadze, S. Bliadze, N. Bliadze, B.Churchelauri. PROPELLER WITH INCREASED ENERGY EFFICIENCY. SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL JOURNAL, "BUILDING" #3(67), (2023)
10. Leishman, J. G. Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. 2nd Edition.