A working hypothesis on the muon-decay time shortening and time
|1, RMLBaker, Jr. |
1Transportation Sciences Corporation, |Palm Desert, CA 92260, USA
|Space Sci. & Technol. 2019, 25 ;(3):60-77|
|Publication Language: English|
The Earth’s atmosphere is showered with cosmic rays that originate from interstellar space. When cosmic rays collide with the Earth’s atmosphere, they decay into Muons. These Muons further decay, with several different decay modes, over accurately measured time (out to six to eight significant figures). Muons can be represented as clocks, which can run fast or slow.
Here I have speculated that the duration of Muon decay measured in experiments in 1946-2017 years, which should be a constant, appears to shorten gradually, perhaps irregularly (including pauses), from very roughly 2.330 microseconds (1946) to very roughly 2.202 microseconds (1962-1963). There are questions concerning the most recent measurements, and more accurate experimental data is required to confirm or view with doubt a trend for the gradual shortening of Muon decay time. Namely, from 2007.0 to 2009.5 the more precise Muon decay time measurements exhibit a decrease in apparent Muon decay time of very approximately 13 ps per year. Although this numerical trend is not statistically significant, certainly the apparent decrease in Muon decay time cannot be absolutely ruled out according to a review of the presented data.
Speculation about the cause of the apparent shortening of Muon-decay time suggests that it is tied to the possible variation of the speed of time (clocks running fast or slow) in our Universe. The working hypothesis, to inspire the research of others, is that the intrinsic Muon decay time is not decreasing slightly as measured on its intrinsic clock, but its apparent decay time is decreasing slightly as measured on clocks associated with our Earth and/or our Universe; clocks that are running very slightly fast and slowing down. Several published studies of time variability in our Universe are analyzed. A Proposition that some complex processes or sub systems such as Muon decay are “marching” to their own intrinsic, fixed, “time” or timeframe, which is independent of the flow of “time” in our Universe, is proposed and several published research papers are cited to support the Proposition. Ramifications of the possible change in the speed of time to various scientific fields are mentioned.
|Keywords: Big Bang, Big Rollout, dark energy, dark matter, early Universe, high-frequency gravitational waves, Muon, Muon decay time, relic gravitational waves, speed of time|
1. Conversi, M., Piccioni, O., Pancini, E. Pions and Muons Conversi, Pancini, Piccioni (CPP) experiment. (1946). Slide 10. http://www0.mi.infn.it/~neri/HomePage/Teaching_files/Esperimento_CPP.pdf .
2. Lindy, R. A. Precision Measurement of the μ+ Lifetime. Phys. Rev., 125(5), 1686—1696 (1962).
3., M. T., Filippas, A., Sutton, R. B., Welsh, R. E. Eckhause Measurements of Negative-Muon Lifetimes in Light Isotopes. Phys. Rev., 132(1), 422—425 (1963).
4. Olive, K. A. Particle Data Group. Chinese Phys. C, 38(9), 648 (2014).
5. Coan, T. E., Ye, J. Muon Physics. v05110.o, Rutgers Univ. Report, page 1 URL: www.physics.rutgers.edu/ugrad/389/muon/muonphysics.pdf (2016).
6. Webber, D. M. Measurement of the Positive Muon Lifetime (decay) and Determination of the Fermi Constant to Part-per-Million Precision. Phys. Rev . Lett., 106:041803, the MuLan Collaboration (2011).
7. Tischchenko, V. Precision measurement of the positive muon lifetime by the MuLan collaboration. Nuclear Physics B — Proceedings Supplements, 225—227, April—June, 232—235 (2013)
8. Barazandah, C. et al. A Cosmic Ray Muon. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 770, 012050, P. 2, Section 2.1 (2016).
9. Physics OpenLab, January 10, URL: http://physicso-penlab.org/2016/01/10/cosmic-muons-decay/ (2016)
10. Adams, M. Cosmic Ray Meeting. February, 2017, Slide 10, Slide 11, Slide 12. URL: https://indico. cern.ch/event/596002/contributions/2463437/attachments/1410577/2157296/Adams-Rome.pdf
11/ Baker, Jr. R. M. L. Gravitational Waves: the World of Tomorrow, a Primer with Exercises. 3rd Printing, Chapters 2, 8, 10, 11 and 12, Infinity Publications, West Conshohocken, PA, (2017).
12. Houghton, M, Vaas, R. (Eds.). The Arrows of Time, a Debate in Cosmology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidel-berg, 8, (2012).
13. Beckwith, A. W. History lessons from the 5th Solvay Conference, 1927. Section XVII, Appendix B. Chongqing University Department of Physics Report for the 27th Solvay Conference in Physics (2017) as drafted and emailed to the author in September, 2017.
URL: http://www.drrobertbaker.com/docs/Beckwith%20 %282017%29v2%20History%20Lesson%20from%20 the%205th%20Solvay%20Meeting.pdf
14. Bisadi, Z., Fontana, G, Moser, E., Pucker E., and Pavesi, L. Robust quantum random number generation with silicon nanocrystals light source. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 35, N 9, 1588—1594 (2017).
15. Karimov, A. R. A model of discrete-continual time for a simple physical system. Progress in Physics, 2, 69—70 (2008).
16. Fontana, G. Gravitational waves in hyperspace. CP969, Proceedings of the Space Technology and Applications International Forum-STAIF 2008, Ed. M. S. El-Genk © 2008 American Institute of Physics 978-0-7354-0486-l/08/23.00 P. 1055 (2008).
17. Corda, C., Fontana, G., Garcia-Cuadrado, G. Gravitational Waves in Hyperspace. Modern Physics Letters A, 24, N 8, 575—582 (2009).
18. Baker, Jr. R. M. L. High-Frequency Gravitational Wave research and application to exoplanet studies. Space Sci. & Technol., 23(3), 47—63 (2017).
19. Dizikes, P. Does time pass? MIT NEWS OFFICE January 28, URL: http://news.mit.edu/2015/book-brad-skow-does-time-pass-0128 (2015).
20. Radcliffe, S. The Flow of Time in a Timeless Universe. Quantum Physics, SAND https://www. scienceandnonduality.com/the-flow-of-time-in-a-timeless-universe/ (2014).
21. Rovelli, C. The Order of Time. Riverhead Books (2018).
22. Barbour, J. The End of Time: the Next Revolution in Physics. Oxford University Press, (1999).
23. Barbour, J. The Nature of Time. arXiv:0903.3489v1 [gr-qc](2009).
24. Lemley, B., Fink, L. Guth’s Grand Guess. Discover Magazine, 23, N 4, 1/8—8/8, April (2002).
25. Mars, M., Senovilla, J., Vera, R. Is the accelerated expansion evidence of a forthcoming change of signature on the brane?” Phys. Rev. D., 77, 027501. Publ. Jan. 11 (2008).
26. Senovilla , J. New Scientist, 2635, 5—22, December 22 (2007).
27. Araya, I. J., Bars, I. Generalized dualities in one-time physics as holographic predictions from two-time physics. Phys. Rev. D., 89, 1—57 (2014).
28. Mori shima, K. Discovery of a big void in Knufu’s Pyramid by observation of cosmic ray Muons. Nature , 552, 388 (2017).
29. Baker, R. M. L., Jr., Makemson, M. An Introduction to Astrodynamics. P. 11. Academic Press, New York (1960).
30. Van Dokkum, P., et al. A galaxy lacking dark matter. Nature, 555, 629—632, (2018).
31. Mller, O., Pawlowski, M. S.,. Jerjem, H., Lelli, F. A whirling plane of satellite galaxies around Centaurus A challenges cold dark matter cosmology. Science, 359, 6375, 534 (2018).
32. Cho, A. Cosmic dawn signal holds clue to dark matter. Science, 359, 6379, 969 (2018).
33. Wolchover, N. Deathblow Dealt to Dark Matter Disks. Quanta Magazine, November 17 (2017).
34. Bertone, G., Tait, M. P. A new era in the search for dark matter. Nature, 562, 51—56 (2018).
35. Buzsaki, G., Llinas, R. Space and time in the brain. Science, 358, 6362, 482—485 (2017).
36. Woods, R. C., Baker, R. M. L., Jr., Li, F., Stephenson, G. V., Davis, E. W., Beckwith, A. W. A new theoretical technique for the measurement of high-frequency relic gravitational waves. J. Mod. Phys., 2 (N 6), 498—518 (2011).
37. Parker, R. H., Yu, C., Zhong, W., Estey, B., Muller, H. Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model. Science, 360, 6385, 191, 194, 195 (2018).
38. Clery, D. Data trove helps pin down the shape of the Milky Way. Science, 360, 6387, 363 (2018).
39. Cartilage, E. Better atomic clocks herald new era of time keeping. Science, 359, 6379, 968 (2018).
40. Cho, A. World poised to adopt, new metric units. Science, 362, 6415, 626 (2018).
41. McGrew, W. F. et al. Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimeter level. Nature, 564, 87—90 (2018).