Ionospheric effects during flights of the rocket «Soyuz» under magnetically quiet and magnetically disturbed conditions

1Zhivolup, TG, 2Chernogor, LF
1Institute of Ionosphere of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
2V.N. Karazin National University of Kharkiv, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Kosm. nauka tehnol. 2010, 16 ;(3):22-31
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2010.03.022
Publication Language: Russian
Abstract: 
The results of observations of large-scale (about 2000 km) disturbances in the ionosphere which arose during launching and flight of rockets «Soyuz» are presented. It is important that one of the rockets was launched on magnetically quiet day and another rocket was launched on magnetically disturbed day. It is confirmed what even a moderate magnetic storm can strongly mask ionospheric effects of rocket launchings. We found delay times and speeds of waves which are responsible for carry of disturbances. Our results are in good agreement with results of our earlier researches.
Keywords: ionospheric effects, magnetically disturbed conditions, waves
References: 
1. Afraimovich E. L., Perevalova N. P. GPS-monitoring of the earth's upper atmosphere. 480 p. (Irkutsk, 2006) [in Russian].
2. Burmaka V. P., Panasenko S. V., Chernogor L. F. Modern techniques for Spectral Analysis of Quasi-Periodic Variations in the Geospace Environment. Uspekhi sovremennoi radioelektroniki, No. 11, 3—24 (2007) [in Russian].
3. Burmaka V. P., Chernogor L. F. Complex Diagnostics of Ionospheric Plasma Disturbed by Far Rocket Launches. Radio Physics and Radio Astronomy, 14 (1), 26—44 (2009) [in Russian].
4. Burmaka V. P., Chernogor L. F. Complex diagnostics of disturbances in the ionospheric plasma parameters far from the trajectories of launched rockets. Geomagn. Aehron., 49 (5), 667—682 (2009) [in Russian].
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793209050119
5. Garmash K. P., Kostrov L. S., Rozumenko V. T., et al. Global ionospheric disturbances caused by a rocket launch against a background of a magnetic storm. Geomagn. Aehron., 39 (1), 72—78 (1999) [in Russian].
6. Zhivolup T. G., Chernogor L. F. Ionospheric effects during rocket «Proton» flight: results of vertical sounding. Kosm. nauka tehnol., 16 (3), 15–21 (2010) [in Russian].
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2010.03.015
7. Zaslavsky G. M., Sagdeev R. Z. Introduction to nonlinear physics: From pendulum to turbulence and chaos, 368 p. (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].
8. Karlov V. D., Kozlov S. I., Tkachev G. N. Large-scale disturbances of the ionosphere occurring during the flight of a rocket with a working engine. Kosmicheskie Issledovaniia18 (2), 266—277 (1980) [in Russian].
9. Chernogor L. F. Physics of Earth, Atmosphere, and Geospace from the Standpoint of System Paradigm. Radio Physics and Radio Astronomy,  8 (1), 59—106 (2003) [in Russian].
10. Chernogor L. F. Advanced methods of spectral analysis of quasiperiodic wave-like processes in the ionosphere: Specific features and experimental results. Geomagn. Aehron., 48 (5), 681—702 (2008) [in Russian].
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208050101
11. Chernogor L. F. On Non-Linearity in Nature and Science: Monograph, 528 p. (Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, 2008) [in Russian].
12. Chernogor L. F. Radiophysical and Geomagnetic Effects of Missile Takeoff, 386 p. (V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, 2009) [in Russian].
13. Adushkin V. V., Kozlov S. I., Petrov A.V. (Eds) Ecological Problems and Risks at Rocket and Space Technique Impact on the Environment, 640 p. (Ankil, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian ].
14. Abdu M. A., Muralikrishna P., Batista I. S., Chaves A. H. P. On the rocket-induced wave disturbances in the daytime equatorial ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 93 (4), 2758—2760 (1988).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA093iA04p02758
15. Booker H. G. A local reduction of F-region due to missile transit. J. Geophys. Res., 66 (4), 1073—1081 (1961).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i004p01073
16. Drobzhev V .I., Gordienko G. I., Mukasheva S. N. Ionosphere disturbances during rocket launches at Baikonur (Kazakhstan). Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 67 (4–5), 433—439 (2004).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2004.06.020
17. Felker J. K., Roberts W. T. Ionospheric rarefaction following rocket transit. J. Geophys. Res., 71 (19), 4692–4694 (1966).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ071i019p04692
18. Jackson J. E., Whale H. A., Bauer S. J. Local ionospheric disturbance created by a burning rocket. J. Geophys. Res., 67 (5), 2059—2061 (1962).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ067i005p02059
19. Mendillo M., Hawkins G. S., Klobuchar J. A. A sudden vanishing of the ionospheric F-region due to launch of skylab. J. Geophys. Res., 80 (16), 2217—2228 (1975).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA080i016p02217
20. Mendillo M. Ionospheric holes: a review of theory and recent experiments. Adv. Space Res., 8 (1), 51—62 (1988).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(88)90342-0
21. Mendillo M. The effect of rocket launches on the ionosphere. Adv. Space Res., 1 (20), 275—290 (1981).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(81)90302-1
22. Prolss G. W. On explaining the local time variation of ionospheric storm effects. Ann. Geophys., 11, P. 1 (1993).
23. Prolss G. W. Common origin of positive ionospheric storms at middle latitudes and the geomagnetic activity effect at low latitudes. J. Geophys. Res., 98, P. 5981 (1993).
https://doi.org/10.1029/92JA02777
24. Prolss G. W. Ionospheric F-region storms. In: Handbook of atmospheric electrodynamics, Ed. by H. Volland, Vol. 2, 195 p. (CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, 1995).

25. Stone M. L., Bird L. E., Balser M. A Faraday rotation measurement on the ionospheric perturbation produced by a burning rocket. J. Geophys. Res., 69 (5), 971—977 (1964).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ069i005p00971