Presentation of the gravity field of celestial bodies using the potentials of flat ellipsoidal disks

1Fys, MM, 1Brydun, AM, 1Sohor, AR, 1Lozynskyy, VA
1Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine
Space Sci. & Technol. 2023, 29 ;(2):78-85
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2023.02.078
Publication Language: Ukrainian
Abstract: 
One of the possible ways for representing the external gravitational field of the planet by the potentials of flat discs, based on the classical potential theory, is proposed. At the same time, the potentials of a single- and double-layer are used for the description with the placement of the integration regions in the equatorial plane. The coefficients of the series expansion of these functions are linear combinations of the Stokes constants of the gravitational field and are uniquely expressed in terms of them. Series terms are single- or double-layer potentials. This makes it possible to calculate these terms using the results of the ellipsoid potential theory. The convergence of such a series, in contrast to the traditional one for spherical functions, is much wider and practically covers the effect of the external potential excluding the region of integration, including in the superficial parts of the surface. Since there is no problem with the convergence of the obtained expansions, we can interpret the obtained results more fully. The construction of flat density distributions for the potentials of a single and double layer is an additional tool in the study of the internal structure of the celestial body, as it is essentially a projection of the volume density of the planet’s interior onto the equatorial plane. Therefore, the extrema of these functions combine the features of the three-dimensional distribution function of the planet’s interior.
Keywords: ellipsoid, gravitational field, potential, Stokes constants
References: 
1. Akhyezer N., Krejn M. On some questions of moment theories. Khar'kov: HNTYU, 1938, 256 p. [in Russian].
2. Bejtmen H., Erdejn A. [Higher transcendental functions. T. II. Moscow: Nauka, 1974, 294 p. [in Russian].
3. Hobson E.V. Theory of spherical and ellipsoidal functions. Moscow: Yzd-vo yn. lyt., 1953, 476 p. [in Russian].
4. Hrushynskyj N.P.Basics of gravimetry. Moscow: Nauka, Hl. red. fyz. & mat. lyt., 1983, 352 p. [in Russian].
5. Zavizion O.V. Self-gravitating disks as a means of describing the external gravitational fields of celestial bodies. Kinemat. fiz. nebesn.. tel., 2000, Vol. 16, №5, P.477-480. [in Russian].
6. Zavizion O.V. On determining the density of equigravitating rods, which are used to describe the outer gravitational poles of giant planets. Kinemat. fiz. nebesn. tel., 2001., Vol. 17, №1, P.89-92. [in Ukrainian].
7. Kondrat'ev B.P. New methods and problems with solutions. Moscow: Mir, 2007, 512 p. [in Russian].
8. Landkof N.S. Basics of modern potential theory. Moscow: Nauka, 1966, 515 p. [in Russian].
9. Mescheriakov H.A. Problems of theories of potential and the general earth. Moscow: Nauka, Hl. red. Fiz-mat. lyt., 1991, 216p. [in Russian].
10. Muratov R. Z. Ellipsoid potentials. Moscow, Atomizdat, 1976, 144 p. [in Russian].
11. Pellynen L.P. Cherry geodesy (Theoretical geodesy). Moscow: Nedra, 1978, 264 p. [in Russian].
12. Appell Paul , J. Kampé de Feriet Fonctions hypergéometriques et hypersphériques. Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1926, 434p. 13. Axler S., Bourdon P., Ramey W. Harmonic Function Theory (2nd edition). Springer-Verlag, 2001. - 273 р.
14. Fys M.M., Brydun A.M., Yurkiv M.I. On representation of the internal spherical functions and their derivatives in the planetary coordinate system. Mathematical modeling and computing, Vol. 6, №2, 2019, P.251-257.
15. Fys M.M., Brydun A.M., Yurkiv M.I. On approach to determine the internal potential and gravitational energy of ellipsoid. Mathematical modeling and computing, Vol. 8, №3, 2021, P.359-367.
16. Hofmann-Wellenhof Dr. B., Moritz Dr. H. Physical Geodesy. Springer New York, 2005, 403p.
17. Marchenko A. N., Abrikosov O. A. & Tsyupak, I. M. Point mass models and their use in the orbital method of satellite geodesy. 2. Application of point mass models for differential refinement of the orbits of artificial Earth satellites (AES). Kinemat. phys. celest. bodies. 1(5), 1985, P.72-80.
18. Pavlis N.K., Holmes S.A., Kenyon S.C. et al. An Earth Gravitational Model to degree 2160: EGM2008. EGU General Assembly. Geophysical Reaseach Abstracts, 2008, vol. 10, P.2.